Buy my book, The Thrill of the Chaste: Finding Fulfillment While Keeping Your Clothes On!



Or, buy the Spanish-language version: La Aventura de la Castidad!



A Dawn Patrol entry is featured in The Best Catholic Writing 2007.

"Two thumbs up."
— Terry Teachout (referring to my blond haircolor—not my book)

"She needs some new highlights."
— Wonkette (ditto)

Portrait above by Matthew Alderman of Shrine of the Holy Whapping. Click on the artwork for a larger version.

Logo at right by Valerie of Kyriosity.

Enjoy the Dawn Patrol jingle, written and performed by Michael Lynch.

Please read the comments rules before commenting. Thank you.

16670

Site Feed


Powered by Google

Use the drop-down menu below to follow the ongoing saga of "How I Became the Catholic I Wuz":

 

Caricature above by the fab JD King. The book I am holding is Witness, by Whittaker Chambers.

Archives
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
<< current


 
E-mail: dawneden
-at- gmail.com

Visit my home page, Gaits of Eden


eXTReMe Tracker















The exploits of Dawn Eden
 
Wednesday, December 31, 2003

My New Year's Prayer for You

I don't want to leave you this year with my snarky comments about one of the greatest rock songwriters and performers ever (see below), so I'd like to wish you a happy new year.

But a universal "Happy New Year" sounds so impersonal. You are a special person. Why should I just lump you in with all those faceless masses? (And I do mean masses; yesterday's Gawker.com mention of the true-life contretemps between Mom and Paris Hilton brought 1,000 hits in five hours.)

So I have something special I'd like to do for you tonight, something that will take me away from my busy laundry-doing, takeout-eating, and Chesterton-reading New Year's Eve schedule. Drop me a line at dawn -at- dawneden.com (replacing the spam-foiling -at- with a you-know-what). You don't have to write anything in the e-mail if you don't want to; I just need your name and "Dawn Patrol" in the header. Here's what I'll do:

I will pray for God to bless you in the new year.

If you'd like me to pray for anything specific for you or your friends and family, I'll pray for that too, according to God's will. And if you want, I'll even pray for someone you don't know, like Paris Hilton or Howard Dean—we are, after all, supposed to pray for our enemies.

If you're reading this after New Year's Eve and want a prayer, my offer still stands. But I'd most like to receive requests tonight, as I have some time, and it would be a blessing for me to be able to welcome the New Year with prayers for others whom I know want them.

Someone who's never met me recently made a post to a message board containing a link to this blog and a 12-word review: "Isn't this the most whacked-out [expletive] you've ever seen in your life?" I'm sure she'll think that even more when she reads this. I think my Dawn Patrol slogan in the new year is going to be "Whacked-Out [Expletive] for Jesus."

OK, maybe not. But it's cool.
4:18 PM  |

There Goes the Neighborhood

Between reading about Ray Davies' becoming a Commander of the Order of the British Empire, and running into TimesWatch editor Clay Waters on the PATH train—who wrote a review of Muswell Hillbillies that I like far better than the album itself—I have the Kinks leader on the brain tonight.

Despite my lack of fondness for the well-loved Muswell Hillbillies—easily explained when you know that my musical sensibilities lie squarely in the Sixties—I adore the Kinks. (Village Green Preservation Society's my favorite of their albums, though I had the honor of penning liner notes for the reissue of what's arguably their last significant album, 1984's Word of Mouth.) So I was thrilled back in July 1998 when I had the opportunity to attend a Ray Davies press conference—especially since it promised to include a showing of his home movies.

The press conference was to promote a spate of Kinks reissues that included of Muswell Hillbillies. Davies' home movies included footage of Muswell Hill, the working-class London neighborhood where he grew up and to which he's maintained ties—the Kinks' studio, Konk, is based there. After he showed the films, he took questions from the audience.

I asked—nervously, but with every attempt at politeness—"How did the people of Muswell Hill appreciate your depiction of the neighborhood on Muswell Hillbillies? Would you say they believed your depiction reflected the neighborhood accurately?"

Perhaps it's unfair to ask an artist what his audience thinks of him. Even so, I was not prepared for Davies' reaction.

I don't remember his exact words, but I've checked my memories against those of New York Press writer J.R. Taylor, who was also there, and he agrees that Davies dismissed the question—and I recall that it was with utter disgust. How dare I presume that the reaction of the residents of the neighborhood he depicted could have any bearing upon his work of art! At any rate, he implied, the residents clearly adored him, so their opinion of the manner in which he immortalized them was immaterial.

Good old Ray. From now on, you can call him Commander Davies.
3:56 AM  |

Tuesday, December 30, 2003

Tongues Shall Cease

Part of being human is going through every day striving to see one's glass as half full when it really seems half empty.

In general, I'm blessed in that I experience relatively little persecution for my faith. But there are days when I'm strongly reminded that I live and work in a secular world. Yesterday was one of those days.

It started early in my workday when I was having a conversation with my boss and he asked me to explain a religious reference I'd made. He's never objected to such conversation, so when I answered him by quoting from a psalm, I was jarred to hear a freelancer pipe up, "Please, no religion in the workplace!"

I apologized and lowered my tone so the freelancer couldn't hear, but it put me off balance.

Then it seemed like practically every story given me to copyedit and headline-write was anti-religion or anti-morality. Now, I'm used to getting stories on lurid things like murders and corruption, as well as the tales of "pervs" and "sex sickos" that are the bread and butter of the world's more exciting newspapers. What's hard is going from the story on a federal judge's striking down New Hampshire's law requiring parental notice (not even consent) for abortions, to the one on how Californians are rushing to meet the year-end deadline for filing abuse lawsuits against Roman Catholic dioceses.

After all that, to add insult to injury, I was given a "chit"—the piece of paper that tells me which story to copyedit—labeled, "Kiss."

At first, I thought it was going to be an upbeat story, so I trilled in my Melody-from-Josie-and-the-Pussycats voice, "Oh, that's nice, I get a 'Kiss.'"

"That's actually a very sad story," my boss said solemnly. "It's about all the singles who are afraid they won't get a kiss on New Year's Eve."

Now, the issue of datelessness on New Year's Eve is already a bugbear of mine, as I wrote earlier in these pages (in the "Captive Audience" entry). In fact, although my family has invited me to attend a "First Night" celebration with them, I'm currently leaning towards staying home from darkness onward (you don't want to be out in Hoboken or New York City after dark on New Year's Eve), eating takeout, drinking soda, and reading Volume Two of Chesterton's Illustrated London News essays. But I can assure you that is not what disturbed me about the article.

My boss's assessment of the story turned out to be something of an exaggeration. Based around the results of a Match.com poll asking singles' their New Year's kissing plans, it didn't mention their fearing loneliness, but did lament that "only 42%" of them believed they would get a kiss at midnight.

But the story then proceeded to give singles advice on how to get a total stranger to lock lips with them on New Year's Eve. Not how to get a person to talk with them. Just how to snag that all-important kiss—and what to do with one's mouth while that kiss is in progress.

The mouth advice was quite graphic—enough to put me off my food. Not that I hadn't done all or most of it in my life—and, barring disaster, will do again—but that the it was being given to people on the idea that they should practice it on a total stranger.

I suppose the audience this article is aiming for includes the women whom amfAR believes should have condoms at the ready at all times. What kind of a culture is this, that tells people they're being irresponsible when they don't attempt to block a virus—and then gives them detailed instructions on how to exchange body fluids with strangers?

I copyedited the piece, complete with witty headline ("MISSING THE BUSS") and caption for the "how-to" graphic ("Eve of Seduction")—we are required, after all, to do everything to the Lord, including serving our employer—and then walked to the washroom, feeling dirty. On the way, I noticed someone had dropped a fortune-cookie fortune. Despite my faith, I'm very superstitious [yes, I know how ridiculous that comment sounds to an atheist; that's why I wrote it], so I picked it up.


I've got to tell you, that pagan piece of paper gave me a big smile. I hope it's true. In fact, I'm going to start praying for it to be true. It reminded me that I have a vocation, and an avocation. I want to practice that avocation in every area of life.


2:06 AM  |

Monday, December 29, 2003

Libertine Men and Scarlet Women

At the PATH station today, I noticed for the first time a billboard from amfAR, the American Foundation for AIDS Research. It read: "92% of women carry lip protection. 10% carry HIV protection."

AIDS is a serious and terrible disease whose complications have claimed the life of someone I loved and also felled many people I admire. To imply that women who do not carry condoms are failing to protect themselves from AIDS—which is what amfAR's Web site explicitly states as it refers to the ad's "shocking statistics"—is an insult to me personally and to every responsible, non-condom-toting woman I know.

First of all, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, 55% of American women are married, so including them among the women who should stuff condoms in their purses along with their lip gloss is ludicrous—unless the organization is implying they should always be prepared to cheat on their husbands.

Second, the labeling of condoms as "HIV protection" is misguided, based on the Centers for Disease Control's data—with which Amfar agrees—that condoms are an effective protection only 85% of the time, and then only if used every time and used properly. If I was told that only 85% of the times I ordered soup at my favorite restaurant could I be certain there wasn't any rat in it, I'd find another favorite restaurant.

The true message of the amfAR ad is that everybody's doing it, and those who don't "protect" themselves are just plain irresponsible. This is a valid message if one's target audience consists of B-girls, bags, bawds, bimbos, blowers, broads, call girls, camp followers, cats, chickens, chippies, concubines, courtesans, fallen womans, floozies, harlots, hookers, hostesses, hustlers, loose women, molls, nymphomaniacs, painted women, party girls, pickups, pink pants, pros, scarlet women, sluts, streetwalkers, strumpets, tarts, tomatoes, tramps, trollops, white slaves, whores, and working girls.

It is not a valid message if one is targeting ordinary single women.

If amfAR truly wished its ads to be "arresting," it would go against the pop-culture stream and take a stand in favor of sexual restraint. But scientists will find a cure for AIDS long before that organization dares to profess that people should be "responsible" for anything other than "protecting" themselves from the effects of their own irresponsibility.

I can speak in favor of abstinence because when it comes to having sex on a whim, there but for the grace of God go I. Although at bottom I always wanted to be a loving wife to a loving husband, I was to all appearances a slut for most of my 20s. Thank you for not asking for details.

I still have urges to do things that would require what amfAR so delicately calls "protection." But I know that even if such protection were 100% effective against HIV, it would still be 0% effective against a much more certain disease arising from sex without love: heartsickness. Loveless sex is a very poor Band-Aid against loneliness, and it ultimately keeps the wound from healing.

The difference between my past and present behavior is that I've asked God for the strength to help me restrain myself until I'm in a committed relationship leading to marriage, and I really mean it. Asking Him for strength doesn't absolve me of any personal responsibility, nor is it a fail-safe move if part of me is determined to satisfy an immediate desire. But the strength He gives is real, and it has enabled me to live with a degree of victory over temptation that I would never have thought possible before. And it's available to all who ask for it.

AmfAR, of course, is a secular organization, which is necessary because its mission is to unite people from different cultures and creeds to fight a common enemy. But abstinence, despite what those who oppose it will tell you, is not a religious issue. It's an issue of self-respect and, when it comes to avoiding disease, common sense.

So it's rather telling that, of the 15 articles on the amfAR Web site that mention abstinence, only one mentions it in a positive context. All the other mentions refer to abstinence-only sex-education initiatives, which amfAR vocally opposes.

On the site, you'll find many proclamations that "there is no substantive evidence that abstinence-only education is successful in encouraging young people to delay sexual activity until marriage." But there's no mention of successful abstinence-only programs in the U.S. and also in places like Uganda, the only country in the world to have decreased its HIV infection rate.

Yes, amfAR, I am one of the 90 percent of women who do not carry a condom in their purse. I have a weapon against AIDS of which you do not know.

1:24 AM  |

Sunday, December 28, 2003

Show Me the "Cunnie"

Back when I suffered from depression, I still managed to be a remarkably prolific liner-note writer and magazine journalist, but there were a few times when my stamina failed and someone else took up the assignment that had been intended for me. They were mostly times when I had foolishly taken on a project that didn't really excite me in the first place. I was reminded of this just now when I looked at the longest piece I ever wrote that was never used: 5,000 words on Connie Francis.

I'm sorry to say that the mammoth piece, which I wrote in early 1996 on assignment from a German record label, was doomed from the start. I was suffering from the worst depression of my life at that point, and I needed something more to get me out of bed in the morning than the knowledge that I would be writing about "Lipstick on Your Collar." Although I bore no ill will towards Francis—and indeed found her a wonderful interview subject—I lacked the passion for her music that would have carried me through the endeavor.

I completed the notes late, having written them in a cool, diplomatic tone not worthy of a collection for which her fans would plunk down $150. It was one of the only times of my life that my assigned work was rejected.

For all that, besides getting to do the interview, I did get one memory out of my Connie Francis liner-note experience that I can smile about today. It's of the voice of the German record-label head, calling from overseas to inquire about my progress.

As I grew closer to my deadline, my boss started to realize that I was probably not going to finish the project on time, and that I also probably was not writing it with sufficient reverence. This made him grow increasingly agitated, calling me at odd hours. I would pick up the phone, half-asleep, and hear him say, "Where is Connie?"

Except that he didn't say it like that. He said—rather loudly, I thought:

"Vare iss Cunnie?"

So that is what I think about now, when I look at my still-unreleased Francis magnum opus, when I hear "Who's Sorry Now" on the radio, when I see a still from the film "Where the Boys Are." I think, "Vare iss Cunnie?" And I hope she is as happy with her post-1996 life as I am with mine.

1:23 AM  |

Saturday, December 27, 2003
Mom Outwits the Ditz

I get worried when I see my mother about to confront some nasty people.

We were in the lobby of the Theater at Madison Square Garden yesterday morning, trying to make our way into the theater itself to join other family members who had already taken their seats for the show, "A Christmas Carol." It was crowded, and some young people were loitering, blocking one of the ways in. My mother, who has been walking with difficulty due to knee pain, tried to make her way around them, but they completely ignored her.

"I'm going to tell them they shouldn't block the way," she said to me. "It's not right."

"Uh, Mom..." I said, not wanting a confrontation. The youths looked like snobs, and I didn't want them to abuse her.

But she went ahead and chewed them out, politely but firmly telling them they shouldn't block the way. She directed most of her mini-lecture to a young woman who looked like the ringleader. They offered no reaction, but stood there like statues. Clearly, they were not in the Christmas spirit—or any spirit, as far as I could tell.

As we passed around off to the group's side, Mom huffed, "They just stared straight ahead like, 'duuhhhh'..." She glazed her eyes and let her mouth hang open for emphasis.

I looked over at the blonde ringleader and that was exactly how she looked—leaning against a wall, eyes glazed over like day-old doughnuts, her pink lips lazily parted...

Those eyes...lips...Ah. It made sense now.

"She doesn't have to pay attention to you, Mom," I said with sarcastic resentment. "She's Paris Hilton."

Mom, bless her heart, hardly watches any TV and doesn't read the tabloids, so even when I told her that, she barely knew who Paris was. To her, the heiress was just a young woman who could use a lesson in manners. And she gave her one! What a cool lady! I am so proud of her.

Of course, this calls for a Tale of the Tape.

I realize this is really unfair to Paris, because to compare my Mom to Paris Hilton is like shooting fish in a barrel. But they did have a confrontation, and my mom did what millions of moms and dads around the country would like to do: reminded her that, regardless of whether she can get away with her famous detachment or not, it's not a good way to live.

In Paris's defense, I should say that I told the story of Paris vs. Mom to a Page Six contributor who said, "That's Paris. She can't help being clueless. She just is."

Well, Ms. Hilton may have been clueless before, but now she has no excuse. She has now been put on notice. The alarum has sounded, and Mom has blown the ram's horn. If this Hilton still has a vacancy, she'll have to make up her own room.

TALE OF THE TAPE

PARIS vs. MOM
AT THE GARDEN, 12/26/03

Height—

PARIS: 5-foot-8
MOM: 5-foot-4

Education—

PARIS: GED
MOM: M.A., Psychology; acting-school degree; Licensed Professional Counselor

Nickname—

PARIS: Star
MOM: Mommy

Most famous home-movie performance—

PARIS: Romping like an animal with another woman's husband, 2001
MOM: Sauntering to the zoo with her husband and kids, doing impressions of the gorillas, 1972

Past occupation:

PARIS: Living in a group home on a farm in Arkansas, attempting to learn a trade
MOM: Overseeing group homes of mental patients in New Jersey, helping them learn trades

Thoughts on a heritage of luxury—

PARIS:"I don't want to be known as the granddaughter of the Hiltons. I want to be known as Paris."
MOM: "This Sunday, Father's Day, we're going to the Hilton for a spa day, and we're staying over in the 'Tower Room,' which sounds very posh to me."

On everyday life—

PARIS: "I went to Wal-Mart for the first time. I always thought they sold wallpaper. I didn't realize it has everything. You can get anything you want there for really, really cheap."
MOM: "I love my job, but not the conditions. It's kind of like that joke about the guy who gives elephants enemas before they perform at the circus. He's got big barrels of water and a garden hose. The elephants stand on a platform. After he "does" them, they shoot out their you-know-what. When his friend visits his work site, he asks him why he doesn't quit and get a better job. 'What?' he exclaims in reply. 'And give up show business?'"

And on humility—

PARIS: "I think the biggest misconception about me is that I'm this spoiled brat. But I'm not. I'm the total opposite."
MOM: "God is making me thankful that I am one of His little people. He is telling me He loves me for what I am....Be encouraged. It is quite an honor to be small. Look around at the people you have most admired in your life. Weren't they all small?"

Special offer for Gawker.com readers: If you discovered this entry through Gawker.com and enjoyed reading it, you can read the latest Dawn Patrol post absolutely free! Even if you didn't enjoy it, you can still read the latest Dawn Patrol post absolutely free!

UPDATE, 1/12/04: More of Mom's wisdom appears in a more recent entry, this one regarding "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King."
12:24 AM  |

Thursday, December 25, 2003


4:15 AM  |

"Uh, What's a Kukelchoo?"

Donna of Donnaville, who recently linked to The Dawn Patrol after discovering it via Dustbury.com (everything's wonderfully related in blogland), appears to be the kind of beautiful, creative, funny, prayerful, not-sitting-on-her-duff-waiting -for-Prince-Charming gal many of us aspire to be. At least, I know I do. Take, for example, the following lines from her entry on the second anniversary of a major breakup—titled, "Prince Charming my a--" (deletion mine):

The last 2 years were spent trying to replace him with a slightly different model. One who wasn't so frightened of commitment and Republicans. Only recently did I decide that instead of replacing him, I would take control of my life, make a home for myself and if a man happens to intersect with me, so be it. I am finished with waiting.
As if Donna weren't already cool enough, she has earned a special place in my heart for the beautiful Web site she created to honor the "Zoom" birthday records beloved by hundreds of thousands of kids of my generation and beyond. ("My name is Zoom and I live on the moon/But I came down to earth just to sing you this tune/'Cause Dawn, you're the big star today!") I was so thrilled by this that I sent Donna scans of my own Zoom birthday record, sent me by my Grandma Jessie in 1976 (three months before the above photo was taken), which she's added to a page on the site.

Personally, I'd love to know who's the nameless session singer on that tune. It sounds quite a bit like the later Nilsson collaborator Andy Cahan, but it really could be anyone. I can imagine what his sessions must have been like: entering a booth and singing a hundred different names, each of them done three different ways: "Da-awn"; "Da-awn"; and then, for the big finish, "[deep breath] "Da-awn!"
3:54 AM  |

Wednesday, December 24, 2003

UPDATED 12/27/03—Great 'Flakes'!

I received the wonderful news today that National Review's Jay Nordlinger praised one of my headlines in his online column "Impromptus":

Another headline—sub-headline, actually—I noticed, this one...when the weather was frightful: "Wave Slams Us: Serial serving of frosty flakes." Groan if you must, but I was tickled by it.
In other headline news: Yesterday wit triumphed over faith as, despite the fact that I'm vehemently anti-cloning, I couldn't resist writing this for a story about how a cloned white-tailed deer might lead to clonings of a dying deer species: "Cloned deer could save bucks."

Today's paper has a headline I wrote for a story about a specially designed wedding dress that boasts the Yankees logo: "Gown for the spouse that Ruth built."

Well, I hope I've given you a smile for your holiday. Merry Christmas and happy Chanukah, everyone!

3:50 AM  |

One of the many things for which I'm thankful this holiday season are friends old and new. I've gathered a few photos that were taken this past month of me with pals (including Robert George, left)—plus one completely unrelated photo of a giant phony toilet—and put them on a separate page for your enjoyment.
3:29 AM  |

Tuesday, December 23, 2003

Delving Into My "Blue" Material

I just discovered that one Manasclerk, a DC Comics-loving Christian libertarian (sort of an alternate-universe Todd) recently wrote in his blog, The Power Struggle, that a post of mine inspired him.

Manasclerk's post is itself very affecting, and I strongly recommend you check it out. Although he doesn't say which of my posts inspired him, I think it was "Captive Audience," where I wrote about how, regardless of how I may feel at a given moment, Jesus has already, in a very real sense, led my captivity captive. He healed me from depression and gave me grace sufficient for me—grace which, even if I may not fully comprehend it now, I am promised that I will comprehend as I continue my walk with Christ.

Manasclerk's experience of God's calling to him and raising him up from darkness parallels my own. I'm especially struck by his writing, "My life as a son of God is lived in perpetual longing, not in aching plainness but rich beauty, as if I had part of me seeing in black and white and another watching a Technicolor, 70mm masterwork of cinematography." It reminds me of C.S. Lewis's description of Heaven in The Great Divorce, where he suggested that people in Heaven look back and believe they were there from birth (and likewise for those in Hell).

Life is a sacred gift. When we see it from a godly perspective, even as it exists in this fallen world, we take in a wondrous package of blessings. But maintaining that perspective requires us to constantly remind ourselves of which elements of the picture are really important.

This world is like Lewis Carroll's Looking-glass world. It is not by any means to be taken lightly, nor is it unreal in the Gnostic sense of being an illusion. Yet, in order to see it clearly, we often need to mentally flip the images over, so that the values are set in their right place. This takes more than prayer. It takes mental effort every day. But it is not impossible and, if we allow ourselves to be led by the Lord, He will lead us in the paths of righteousness, his Holy Spirit guiding us and making our way clear.

A couple of nights ago, I posted a photo here that I called "Blue Dawn." I had come home from a depressing and agitating party experience, which brought for me themes of guilt, sadness, anger, and loneliness. Since I couldn't go to bed feeling like that, and I'm not the sort of person who can just sit and pray for an hour until my emotions settle down, I came up with a harmless way to release my feelings: putting them into an artful, purposefully glamorous photo of me looking sad. At the age of 35, I still enjoy playing dress-up, so I wound up having fun in spite of myself.

But the fact that I could do something like that as a release—and not be tortured by self-destructive temptations—is truly a miracle.

Until four years ago, when God healed me of my depression, the combination of guilt, sadness, anger, and loneliness was a potent cocktail that got my imagination going in a far more severe direction than it did the other night. I would obsess on ways to take out my anger on myself. Being that my depression ran in cycles, with each cycle seeming worse than the last, a small event could spark suicidal thoughts in me. After all, I thought, if I'm feeling pain, I'm only going to feel pain again, right? What's it worth the normal times in between if it's always going to end like this?

But I never made a serious suicide attempt, thank God. Instead, a complex web of emotions would give me a temptation, very difficult to resist, to harm myself in other ways. Those emotions included wanting to punish myself; wanting to feel physical pain to take my mind off of emotional pain; and, most of all, just wanting to bring all those feelings that were eating at me to a head. Those emotions were like a cancer. If I could bring them out, even at the price of some physical pain, I could rest for a while until they troubled me again.

It was relatively rare for me to actually hurt myself. My self-destructive moods almost always came late at night, and usually if I struggled with the temptation of self-abuse long enough, I would break into tears—easing my emotional burden—and fall asleep. I was also blessed in that I was terrified at the sight of my own blood, or at the thought that I might actually cut myself the wrong way—in my heart, I didn't think it was the right way—and actually die or be hospitalized.

So I wound up occasionally scratching myself with kitchen utensils, never with any marks that showed. It was my little secret. I occasionally let slip about it to my mother or my therapist, but no one could really do anything about it other than medicate me—which, oddly, made it worse. Medication controls impulsivity, but it also can make you feel numb. That means, if you're still depressed on medication—and at one point I was on enough Wellbutrin to kill a horse—your emotions fester longer, and you feel more of a need to bring what's inside to the outside.

My self-destructive thoughts were linked to a feeling that, at base, I had no real value as a person, and deserved to be punished in some way. This could be seen in some sense to reflect the Christian worldview that we are all sinners and, as the Psalms say, none of us are good, "no, not one." But what I was missing was God.

God does say that all have sinned, and that none of us is inherently good. But He also says that He will not forsake them that seek Him. This, I believe, answers a question that Manasclerk puts forth in his post, when he implies that he's feared that salvation was for others and not for him.

I feared that too, for the entire 15 years that I suffered from depression. Happy people would smile at me and tell me how much better my life would be if I knew God. You don't understand, I wanted to say to them. I've asked God to take me. He doesn't want me. He's saddled me with this horrible burden that He won't remove.

One thing that I have learned from trying unsuccessfully to convert an atheist is that God doesn't need an wide-open door. All he needs is for the door to be open a crack. The difference between a door that's closed and one that's open just a crack is enormous. It's binary. It's the difference between darkness and one small candle.

When the stealth campaign that God had long been waging on me entered its final stage in the summer of 1999, I wasn't going around 24 hours a day begging Him to enter my heart. I was spending more time trying to find the right pair of crocheted pantyhose to wear with my microminidress at my job creating a Web site for an East Village trash-culture video store. (And I did—see right.) But that crack in my heart was still open, and that was all God needed.

Remember this during the Chanukah and Christmas season: Every other religion in the world says that the Deity will not come to you; you must chase after or make supplication to the Deity. Judaism and Christianity are the only religions that reveal the truth: God seeks us. We love Him, because He first loved us.





1:31 AM  |

Monday, December 22, 2003

Girls' Night Out

Here's a shot of me at Saturday night's party, surrounded by my fab friends Janet Rosen (left) and Betsy Gibson (right).

Betsy is a writer, political journalist, and former editor at WorldNetDaily, where she made a name for herself for her fiery op-eds on the Clinton scandals. Janet wears many hats besides that chic Fifties felt number, including those of stand-up comedian and trivia-game host (the latter every Wednesday at Dempsey's Pub). You can tell Janet's a true comic talent because she is the only woman I know with the guts to proudly put her Doritos on display. Even cooler, they match both our outfits.

12:25 AM  |

Sunday, December 21, 2003

Dwight Christmas

Home-recording guru R. Stevie Moore just forwarded me a delightful e-mail from Lane Steinberg of the Brian Wilson-loving band Tan Sleeve. I am printing it here with Lane's permission. If you'd like to give him the witness he requests, he may be reached through the Tan Sleeve Web site:

I casually took note several weeks ago as I was scanning the FM dial in the car and zeroed in on an obscure Elton John number, "Step Into Christmas". It's about thirty years old. It was never on any album, just a single (45's - remember?). The song is Elton at his most Spector/Beach Boys, a sonic homage to "I Can Hear Music", with a lush, distant wall of sound replete with sleigh bells and tambourine. There's a neat, uneven meter on the "A" part of the verse as one beat is cut at the end of each line. The "B" part of the verse features a nice major/minor move that further underscores the Brian Wilson influence. The chorus is in Elton's typical hammer-it-home-sell-that-song style, with many repititions of the title. But the whole thing grooves with a righteous spirit of good fun. The late Dee Murray's bass playing is especially tasty & funky in a very neo-James Jamerson way.

Before this year, I maybe heard the song three times in my entire life. But in the past two weeks I've heard this song more than "Jingle Bells". My audio signals are totally crossed and I seem to be tapping into some alternative Christmas Top Ten. Wherever I go, be it Super Cuts, Key Food, Starbucks, Time Warner Cable, Sam Ash, my dentist's office, the song is positively stalking me. I'm talking several times a day. This morning, temporarily forgetting about this strange phenomenon, I walked into Radio Shack and was greeted by ten TV screens playing an old video of Elton's classic line-up, circa "Goodbye Yellow Brick Road" (Elton still had some of his own hair) doing, yes, "Step Into Christmas". I kept my cool and actually enjoyed the near-ancient piece of footage without thinking about the randomness of the universe, master plans, etc.

But I left Radio Shack, wondering, "Why now? Why this year?" Had the song always been this prevalent and I just barely dodged it all these other years, only to have it finally find me like the flu? Or maybe I just happened to have been listening at precisely all the forty times it's been played in the tri-state area this entire Christmas season. Maybe it's some sort of signal from the cosmos. But what can it mean? Do I have to personally "Step Into Christmas This Year" as Elton advises throughout the song? How does one do this? The song, in it's frivolity, doesn't give specific instructions. Is it a metaphor for something in my life? I'm beginning to feel like a cross between George Bailey and Kevin Costner's character in "Field Of Dreams".

I suppose I could be more charitable. Yesterday, before the jolt of seeing Elton sing this on the screen, I (uncharacteristically, I must admit) offered a particularly pathetic bag lady with two small dogs a five dollar bill. She wouldn't take it and I, perhaps too quickly, withdrew the money. Should I have been more insistent? I thought about all this as I left Radio Shack, my mind a jumble of guilt, Christmas thoughts, and visions of huge glasses & silver sequined platform shoes. I had to get a hold of myself and release this self-inflicted grip of paranoia. I walked up the block to Le Croissant for a cup of coffee. As I got in line, the radio was offering up the waning strains of Sammy Davis Jr's. version of "The Christmas Song". And as Sammy faded out, the now-familiar opening bars of "Step Into Christmas" started up again.

Am I alone in witnessing this Christmas miracle? Please help me... —Lane Steinberg

8:12 PM  |

Blue Dawn

Memo to men I have dated, however long it's been since I've dated you, and however little our having dated may have impacted your psyche: Do not invite me to a party at your place without telling your current, live-in girlfriend who I am—causing me to wind up having her sit next to me with a smile and say, "So, how do you know [my boyfriend]?"

It's actually a position I've been in before, but not one I'd ever wanted to be in again. This time around, experience and common sense insured I handled the situation diplomatically, but I felt drained and angry. Angry at the guy who thought he'd pepper his party with one or more old flames unbeknownst to his current one, and angry at myself for risking discomfort by going to the party.

At least the party itself wasn't a waste by any means. Two of my best female friends were there, plus a prayer was answered when another friend, one I didn't know so well, said she'd be willing to go to church with me.

Still, I came home feeling sad and mad, so I decided to do something before bed to get as much of it out of my system as possible. Since my groovy black eyeliner was still intact, I opted to take a sufficiently moody photo of myself with my new camera. And even feeling blue couldn't stop me from brightening things up with lipstick and a Sandie Shaw-style hat and wig.

So you see the result above: Blue Dawn. Has a nice ring to it, don't you think? I mean, how can I be sad when I'm a dishwashing detergent?
3:22 AM  |

Saturday, December 20, 2003

There Are Many Things I Would Like to Last Forever.
Great Sex Is Not One of Them.

You see some weird things walking down Sixth Avenue at 10:30 p.m. Last night, I was nearing 34th Street when I heard a man shout something unintelligible behind me, followed by sudden silence. I turned to make sure the shouting hadn't been directed at me, and saw a man walking purposefully and completely silent, his jaw clenched and a cell phone jammed against his ear. Probably a lovers' quarrel, I thought, as I passed a bus-stop ad for the last five episodes of "Sex and the City" which read, "Sex this great can't last forever."

Just then, he passed me and walked to the entrance of the 34th Street subway station, where he started shouting into the phone again. He had to linger outside the station to shout, cell phones being what they are. As I kept walking, I apprehended, in a flash, that there was also a woman standing outside that same entrance, shouting into her phone, and it also looked like a lovers' quarrel. She too had to linger outside the entrance so that she could get the last word in before the reception broke. The two angry 30-somethings stood a few feet apart, shouting into their phones like dueling banjos.

Now, putting aside the possibility that the pair could have in fact been shouting at each other—preferring the medium of the cell phone to face-to-face contact—it occurred to me that this could be the premise for a modern-day screwball comedy. Two people break up with their lovers just before getting into a subway station. Then they "meet cute" on the subway stairs and so on.

The only problem is, how would these two hotheads get along with one another? I mean, when you think about it, you have to be a real hothead to have a lovers' quarrel on your cell phone at 10:30 on a Friday night. First of all, unless you have to work like me, you should be with your boyfriend or girlfriend at 10:30 on a Friday. Second, why even attempt to discuss something so imperative to a relationship over the phone? Unless there's some horrible misunderstanding—which they tell me does happen in relationships, though it's been a while—trying to work out important relationship issues from a distance shows a lack of respect.

So I left the phone pair standing outside the station entrance, their dark figures outlined against the Victoria's Secret display-window images of angels as smut goddesses. It was sadly appropriate, in a last-five-episodes-of-"Sex and the City" kind of way.
1:06 PM  |

'Foul' Fare

I had a headline today that I was happy to see earned the praise of a fellow copy editor who used to be a UPI sports writer. It was for a story about how a Cubs-loving restaurant owner bought the famous National League series foul ball so that it could be publicly destroyed: "Buyer of Cubs foul plans wrecking ball."
1:04 PM  |

Friday, December 19, 2003

Familiar "Ring"

Saw the stunning "Return of the King" yesterday and was struck by how much Gondor resembled Jerusalem's Old City in terms of its exterior building style and Jerusalem-like stone, and especially its streets. There must be some "Rings"-trilogy fans reading this who know something about the films' making, or who, like me, have seen Jerusalem—can I get a witness?

I asked Todd, my resident "Rings" expert, about the cities' similarity, and he gave me an answer that I thought was impressive considering he doesn't applaud the trilogy's religious significance: "[Gondor's city, Minas Tirith,] is like Zion in 'The Matrix': It's the only city that really matters." Amen to that.

Captive Audience

I've been feeling lonely lately—it's aggravated by the holidays, plus missing having a date for that pagan event known as New Year's Eve—and so was going to write a garden-variety "poor me" entry. However, I don't really want to do that because I'm trying hard not to define myself by loneliness anymore—especially when it's really the "loneliness of the long-distance runner." After all, much more so than in the past, the object of my life is not a person, but a prize, and my desire for a person comes from the desire for companionship as I endure the long race for that prize.

So, as I sat down not really wanting to write "poor me," a verse came to mind from Psalm 68, as Paul quoted it in Ephesians 4:

But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ.
Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
(Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.)

It was, "he led captivity captive," that came to me first, and then I looked up the rest of the quote. For me, that reminds me that Jesus has already freed me from the captivity of my depression, and gave me the gift of His grace. It is His grace, working in me, that also will free me of my loneliness, without my having to do anything. I need only to prayerfully understand that He has already done this.

The loneliness, as I've said, is something that's part of the nature of being a pilgrim, and I may always have it in some measure. What Jesus has freed me from is the captivity of the loneliness, the tape-loop that goes around in my head telling me that I'm forever stunted and stymied in life because I don't have the right relationship or the right fellowship.

The verse about Christ's having descended and ascending reinforces the message. It reminds me that He has already lifted me up from the worst depths, and He can do and is doing it again, through the grace that He has already given me.

I say He's already freed me. I don't feel free this second. But I know that the truth of His having freed me is a greater truth than the truth of my loneliness. It's more real, somehow. I need to hold onto that truth, and pray on it, with the certainty that my prayer has already been answered.

On a related note, I need to make a real effort to find one person, whose company I enjoy, who will go to church with me—or at least try churches with me. Right now, while I am blessed with Christian blog pals in distant places, I do not have any friends in the New York City area who would gladly set foot in a church with me.

Regardless of what you may feel about churches—and I know that everyone from Family Radio's "the world will end in 1987" guy to people whose opinions I otherwise respect have been coming down on churches lately—you can't beat them for Christian fellowship. Trying to achieve fellowship without a church is like trying to make your own double-skim mochachino lattes instead of going to Starbucks. Theoretically, you can do it. But it takes a lot more trouble and time, and when it comes down to it, you're better off leaving your house for where you're most likely to find your kind of (human) beans—even if you wish they were better filtered.
5:05 AM  |

Thursday, December 18, 2003

Return of the Kin

Let's say, for a moment, that you come from a broken home. You've spent years telling various therapists about how the effects of your parents' breakup and its aftermath have prevented you from forming healthy bonds in your own life. This is classic victim psychology, and it keeps mental-health professionals in business.

But what if your parents' relationship with each other—and you—starts to get healthy? Not to the point of their reconciling—too many years, too much water under the bridge, and two wonderful stepparents—but to the point of actually being able to be together, with their second spouses and longtime kids, in the same room?

Kinda kills that "poor me, I can neither comprehend nor maintain a mature relationship, because my parents' acrimony has denied me a firm foundation of love" excuse, doesn't it?

I think it's safe to say that most kids of divorced parents never get to see that happen. I certainly wasn't expecting to see it myself. But that's going to change in a matter of weeks.

My sister has an important event coming up (something that's a great achievement of hers), and my mother, father, stepmother, stepfather, brother (from Dad's second marriage), and I are all flying out to show our support and pride in her. Since both Mom and Dad want to take her out for dinner that night, my stepmother and father suggested that we all go out together.

I can't tell you what an incredible suggestion that was, and how happy it made me, my sister, my mother, and my stepfather. Although Dad joined Mom, sis, and me for dinner when I graduated college in 1989, the whole family has never been out together in the 28 years since my dad remarried. And my mother's never met my brother, at least not in his adult life. This is officially A Big Deal.

But in one way, it's just the latest of many positive changes in my relationship with my family over the years. It took me a long time to fully appreciate my stepmother (she married my dad a year after the divorce, when I was seven and probably more angry over the split than I realized at the time), but now I love her and am very thankful my dad has her. My dad, from whom I was geographically separated for much of my childhood, has, in my adult life, markedly increased his efforts to take an interest in me and show how much he cares. These are things that I had never thought would happen. The positive effects of feeling such familial love show up in every area of my life and personality.

As one whose life has been renewed by faith in the Lord, I look at such unimaginable changes for good in my life and try to see God's hand in them. In one sense, God is clearly at work, because all good things come from Him. But in another, it's hard for me to understand, with my human brain, why He works such good things in my life, and at this time in my life, when He doesn't do so with everyone.

The idea that these things happen to me because I'm special is not theologically acceptable. First of all, it assumes that I'm a good person, and, second, that good people are rewarded with good things—which, if it were true, would negate the purpose for the book of Job. Faith in God has brought a positive transformation to every aspect of my life, but He provides the good things because of His grace. He doesn't stand next to me every time I do the right thing, like Gene Wilder with Peter Boyle in "Young Frankenstein," and slip me M&Ms.

Moreover, the assumption of my being rewarded for faith would be wrong with regard to my family relationships' improving, because the improvements began before I had faith. In fact, I would say that, back when I was suffering from depression, my father's taking concrete steps to show more caring, concern, and interest in me helped me improve to the point where I was ready for faith.

This is a subject for a whole 'nother blog entry, which I'd love to see someone else write (like Eric, Clarence, ireneQ, the Thinklings, or Kevin), but have you noticed that many people who reject God also reject, or feel rejected by, their own parents—particularly their father? There's something going on there that's more than just a Freudian transference of emotions.

Although I always knew on some level that my father loved me, there were decades when many things combined to make me feel distant from him: my parents' divorce, Dad's second marriage, my geographical separation from him, his innate discomfort with mushiness. During that time, which lasted until my late 20s, I couldn't really imagine his caring about what happened to me from day to day, or having anything approaching empathy for me. He might have sympathy, but not empathy, which is the human way of showing God's love, the caritas described in I Corinthians 13.

Despite my sense of lack, I still had what I would consider a loving dad, much more so than many people I meet who don't hear from their father at all, or who only receive abuse or demands from their father. Certainly he wanted me to be happy, and I'm willing to grant that he felt a lot more than he showed. But even so, I had a great deal of difficulty in imagining a father figure who was touched with the feeling of my infirmities in any significant way, let alone with love as deep and intense as it is expressed in His son Jesus. (Feminist arguments aside, most of God's Word encourages us to imagine His love in masculine terms.)

When my father began to to reach out to me in a way that he never had before—expressing a sincere desire to be a better, more caring, and more interested father to me—it changed me. I wasn't conscious of it at the time, but wheels were set in motion that eventually made me more receptive to God's Word, and to the great spiritual and emotional healing that it would bring.

And the healing continues, not just with me, but with my whole family. I know God is at work here. While I don't know His entire plan in this regard—and I sure hope that it doesn't stop with me—I am thankful that, before I loved him, he loved me.

UPDATE: IreneQ responds to my exhortation by writing that she has already done posts on this topic, which are available on her site under the category Family Matters. I think she's cheating, because I requested a post on the specific dynamic of how the relationship between child and father influences that between child and God, but that shouldn't stop you from reading her insights, which are often touching. My favorite is "Letter From Dad," which I've mentioned here before.

1:22 AM  |

Wednesday, December 17, 2003

"Ring" of Truth

I'm not a "Lord of the Rings" fan (give me Narnia any day) but I'm happy to see the more positive aspects of its message getting play in the major media—and, surprisingly, on the New York Post's Page Six, which is usually where one goes to read the latest commandment-breaking celebrity antics.

Today's Page Six includes an item headed "Moral 'Ring,'" about how parents from New York City's notoriously liberal Upper West Side may be dismayed at the "clear-cut delineation between right and wrong" in "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King." It quotes a fan after Monday night's New York premiere of the film: "There is no moral relativism in Middle Earth. It's Good vs. Evil."

This is not news to anyone who's read the book or seen the first two films, but I'm surprised and pleased that New York's most notorious gossip column would make the film's moral stance a point of discussion. If they were that desperate for a "Rings" item, I'm sure they could have found some salacious tidbit about Liv Tyler's mother or something.

The item also projects that the Upper West Side's Howard Dean fans won't appreciate the film's depiction of a just war. "Appeasement does not work with orcs," the writer notes.

2:43 AM  |

Tuesday, December 16, 2003

My Next 'Storz' Neighbor

Lately I've been discovering a lot of excellent touchy-feely kinds of blogs, based around whatever the writer's feeling that day. They encourage me with the knowledge that I should never feel alone, because I have kindred spirits around the globe.

Then there are deliciously concrete blogs like Charles J. Hill's Dustbury.com, which tell me things I didn't know.

I discovered Dustbury.com after finding that it linked to my recent "'Left' Behind" post. It's a very well-written, witty blog that mixes right-of-center political commentary with items on all manner of popular culture, particularly the vintage kind that I adore.

The post that most impressed me recently was the one about radio-programming legend Todd Storz. It's a strange feeling to come across information on the Web that actually, measurably enhances one's knowledge. The entry's not condescending in the least, but it succeeded in making me feel that I really should have known about the guy.
10:00 PM  |

Seed-y Character

IreneQ wrote to me that she was encouraged by my writing in my "Nerd Vs. Word" post that a book I received as a child helped Jesus gain a foothold in my psyche. It reaffirmed for her the importance of "planting seeds."

As I think back on my life before I accepted Jesus in October 1999, I realize that there were many people who planted or watered* seeds of faith in me. The one who stands out in my mind right now is someone who really, really ticked me off. In fact, if I saw him right now, I'd probably still find him annoying. But I'd also have to thank him.

A little background: When I was in college, in the late 1980s, I was already suffering from the worst kind of cyclical suicidal depression, which plagued me from age 16 all the way up until I was saved. It was cyclical not in the sense of manic highs (which would have made it at least entertaining), but in the sense that I would be OK for a while, then slip into darkness, and eventually edge back up—only to slip into darkness again.

So even when I felt fine, I knew it would be only temporary. There seemed to be no purpose to life: It was just, "Life [stinks], and then you die." Lacking faith that God existed or cared about me, I had no hope of ever getting out of the vicious cycle.

To keep going, I created obsessions for myself. In late 1987, when I was 19, I decided that I was going to write a biography of the late record producer Curt Boettcher. Never heard of him, you say? Well, practically nobody else had either at that point. His death the previous June didn't even merit a mention in Billboard magazine. I had never met him, but since I adored his music, that made me all the more eager to track down people who had worked with him and be the first person to chronicle his story.

While I never wrote that biography, my liner notes to the first several of the many Boettcher-related CDs and my magazine articles about him eventually gained him some of the recognition he deserved. But at the time I began my research, I was the only person on his trail. It gave me a sense of mission. Many times, when I felt suicidal, I reluctantly told myself that I couldn't kill myself because I would be letting Boettcher's family down. I guess you could say that my love for a dead man kept me alive—something I now realize came from God.

My mother had by then accepted Jesus and was going to a Messianic Jewish congregation, Beth Israel. By the fall of 1988, when I was a senior in college, I had gone with her to services once or twice, but I didn't like it.

First of all, there were the people. My mother has worked as a psychologist and social worker, and she is naturally drawn to people who need help, such as the developmentally disabled. Beth Israel particularly reached out to that population, and they in turn reached out to my mother whenever she came through the temple doors. These were people who drooled and had personal-hygiene problems and were generally in-your-face. And they all wanted hugs.

My mother tried to explain to me that they were so eager for hugs from her because nobody else would hug them. I could appreciate that, but I didn't appreciate the fact that, since I was her daughter, they all wanted hugs from me as well.

The other aspect of the Beth Israel service that I particularly disliked was the music style, which was "contemporary." Some things never change: I still can't stand "contemporary worship," which is another reason I've had difficulty finding a church.

In case you're wondering if contemporary music at a Messianic synagogue is any different from that at a church, the only difference is that the only two chords the guitarist knows are not C and G, but A minor and E minor. Other than that, it's the same deal: Fifteen minutes of standing up and clapping to the most droningly pathetic excuses for melodies, while singing along with a projected lyric sheet that says, "HOLY HOLY HOLY (3X)/HOLY HOLY HOLY (3X)/(REPEAT 3X)." It's like a Grateful Dead concert, except that the T-shirts are more expensive.

When my mother realized there was no way I was going back to Beth Israel, she asked me if she could please give Gary Selman my phone number. She asked me this many times.

Selman, along with Beth Israel pastor Jonathan Cahn, is one of the 2 Nice Jewish Boys, who for many years have had an evangelical radio show on a local station. They are extremely zealous for Yeshua (Jesus' Hebrew name) and have brought many Jews and Gentiles to the faith.

Naturally, I was not particularly excited about having Selman, the bad-cop of the duo, call me at my NYU dorm. But I agreed to it because I was suicidally depressed and was willing to try anything that might give me a reason to live. Actually, I really did want the Lord in my life. I just didn't feel anything for Him in my gut, and I didn't know how to get from wanting to believe, to actually believing.

Also, I knew that my taking the call from Gary would make my mom very happy.

So he called that night, about 15 years ago, and kept me on the phone quite a while. He interrogated me about my depression (if you've ever heard his attack-dog persona on the radio, you'll know that's no exaggeration), found my weak spots, and went for them.

I found myself arguing with him, which I think was just what he wanted. It was real classic, Jews for Jesus-style confrontational evangelism.

Finally, he said something that was so offensive that I had to get off the phone. He was asserting that only faith in Jesus could get one into Heaven, and he made the logical leap that everyone who dies without faith in Him goes to Hell.

"Wait a minute," I said. "My Grandma Jessie was the most saintly person I have ever known. She had a pure heart and her only thoughts were to do good. Are you telling me that she is now burning in hell?"

"If she didn't believe in Jesus..." he said.

Now, to this day, even as a Christian, I believe that Selman was wrong. There are Scriptural references that Jesus' sheep know his voice. Whether or not my grandmother accepted Him before her death, I have no doubt that at the final judgement, she will recognize Him for who He is.

Don't get me wrong; I do believe it's essential that people hear the good news of Jesus Christ while they're on this earth. But I don't believe in making judgements about whether specific dead-persons' souls are going upstairs or downstairs. I'm still mad at Selman now, just thinking of what he said, and you can imagine how furious I was at the time.

Before I hung up, Selman said, "Please, just promise me one thing. Think of something you really want, more than anything else, and promise me that you'll ask God to give it to you. Because God really wants you to believe in Him, and He'll answer your prayer so that you'll believe."

I told him I'd do it, just to get him off the phone.

As I lay in bed that night, still seething with anger, I considered what I should pray for. My consuming passion at that time was my Curt Boettcher research. I was regularly going to libraries around town—and even the Library of Congress—looking up phone-book and copyright records in hope of tracking down Boettcher associates to interview for my book.

The associate I wanted most to find was a wonderfully talented singer and songwriter named Sandy Salisbury. I knew he was from Hawaii and had lived in California, so I had cold-called every Salisbury in those states in hope of finding him, with no luck. Since this was before the Internet, I had to find phone books from across the nation in order to track him down, and there were many Salisburys. And for all I knew, he might not even be alive anymore, or he might be out of the country.

So as I lay there in my dorm room, I prayed, "Dear God, please let me find Sandy Salisbury. I want that more than anything else. Please do that for me, and if you do—"

I thought for a moment. "I can't promise I'll believe in you, because I've tried to do that before and it didn't work. But I promise I'll at least go to services with my mom." That was enough of a sacrifice, I thought.

The next morning, as I woke up, before I even opened my eyes, my mind was overcome with one overriding thought: He's in Portland.

When I remember the certainty with which I felt that Salisbury was in Portland—and that I knew it was Oregon, and not Maine—I realize that it was identical to the feeling I had after I became a believer, when I first learned to discern the voice of the Holy Spirit. But at the time, all I knew was that I had to get straight out of bed, make a beeline for my telephone and call Portland Information.

I asked for "last name Salisbury, first name Sandy," and the operator immediately gave me a number. It seemed too simple. Probably it would turn out to be Sally Salisbury.

But no. I called the number, heard the answering-machine voice, and there was no mistaking it. He called me back. My mind was officially blown. (And not just because he'd become a best-selling children's author.)

That day, I made two plans. The first was to interview Salisbury by phone later that week, which I did. The second was to go to services with Mom, which I also did—once,anyway.

It would still be another 11 years before God would give the increase that would transform my life and heal me of my depression. But Gary Selman planted a seed. And I thank him for planting it—even if his fertilizer stank a bit.

*It's interesting to see that, in both the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, anytime the act of watering is mentioned, it always refers to living water. I discovered that just now, looking up "watereth" in the King James Bible on BibleGateway.com. Every occurrence of that word in the Bible is metaphorical, referring to God's watering the earth—and our watering one another—with His sustaining love.
1:41 AM  |

Monday, December 15, 2003

My Lamé Witness

I'm about to finally get a full night's rest after a marathon weekend in which I not only worked Saturday and Sunday as usual, but also put in a six-hour shift as DJ/co-host of the monthly Sixties-pop multimedia dance night POP GEAR! In the photo at left, taken by TimesWatch.org editor Clay Waters, you see me taking a break between DJ shifts, preparing to hand out chocolate to the wonderfully large crowd (the event's biggest yet). (More photos to come.)

Among the dance-floor denizens was Larry Smith of the excellent reunited Sixties garage band Richard & The Young Lions, who brought a celebrity date: Pamela Vandenberg, a former Miss Holland who is best known as Sindy Cinnamon, the Altoids girl. She was lovely and had the grace to smile when my friend Jonathan Funke said to her, "Nice Altoids—oops, wrong campaign."

Pamela gave me a tin of Altoids bearing her picture—which I only later realized, when I saw it in the light, showed her in a devil suit, complete with horns. I guess into every Eden a little Sindy must fall.

The only real dark spot I recall from the night came from the guy who's standing behind me in the photo. I blacked out his eyes in the image because the red-eye effect made him look demonic, but he actually did succeed in creeping me out—not frightening me, really (my friends surrounding me would have looked out for me), but reminding me that God is a charged word for some.

I was handing around chocolate, and when I got to him, he said, "Do you have gelt? Give me the gelt!" He was using the Yiddish word for coins: the chocolate coins that I'd bought specifically to have some Chanukah candy in the mix.

Noticing he was wearing what looked like a cross, I said, "Oh, do you work both sides of the street too? Are you Jewish and Christian?"

He responded with disgust that he was neither.

I backed away a bit. "I just thought...you're wearing a cross..."

"It's not a cross," he snarled—as I realized he was clearly three sheets to the wind. He held the pendant up to my face. "It's a sword."

He wasn't really menacing, just drunk and contrary. He went on to claim that he was born Muslim, but currently had no religion. I tried to think of the most graceful way of excusing myself while still giving the gospel.

"I just want you to know," I said, "that whether or not you believe in God, God exists. And he cares about you, and he loves you."

"I know that," he said, strangely enough.

Phew. I smiled and exited the dance floor, candy in hand, to bring the good word of Christmas candy and Chanukah gelt to the bar.
1:05 AM  |

Sunday, December 14, 2003

Putting Life I