Friday, April 30, 2004
The Truth in Small Things, Part 14: Where the Toys Are
My favorite lunch place, an ice-cream cafe called the Frozen Monkey, is always crowded with moms and babies, so it wasn't too surprising the other day when, as I was eating there, I saw a mother wheeling a double carriage containing a pair of twins. Then I did a double-take.
It wasn't that the adorable blonde pair, less than a year old, wore matching blue hooded coveralls—it's ordinary enough for a mom to dress twins alike.
No, what stopped me was that the boys each had the same toys. Two look-alike babes in look-alike outfits with look-alike bright-green frog cushions in their laps and look-alike padded mobiles dangling from the top of each half of their carriage. A mirror image all 'round.
I found that deeply disturbing.
My eyes strayed up to the mom and I read all sorts of undesirable personality traits in her countenance. But here, truth be told, I was using my imagination. She could have been a very nice person who was simply misguided. Probably when she was pregnant with twins, people bought her two of everything. And I imagine when a mother has such adorable sweet peas, it's difficult for her to resist the attention she'll get from making them look as alike as ones in a pod.
Even so, the sight made me think. And I realized that I am so glad that God does not give each of us the same toys.
I'm not talking about the toys that cost money. I'm talking about every kind of stimulation in life and the ability to appreciate them in a unique way.
Irving Berlin wrote: Got no diamond, got no pearl, still I think I'm a lucky girl—
I've got the sun in the morning and the moon at night.
Got no mansion, got no yacht, still I'm happy with what I got.
I've got the sun in the morning and the moon at night To me, this is a perfectly reasonable reaction to have to heavenly bodies. But the future wife of G.K. Chesterton, the delightfully named Frances Blogg, took a somewhat different view, as Chesterton would relate in his Autobiography: She told me in the most normal and unpretentious tone that she hated the moon. I talked to the same lady several times afterwards; and found that this was a perfectly honest statement of the fact....She really had an obstinate objection to all those natural forces that seemed to be sterile or aimless; she disliked loud winds that seemed to be going nowhere; she did not much care for the sea, a spectacle of which I was very fond; and by the same instinct she was up against the moon, which she said looked like an imbecile. If you think this woman utterly detestable, as I did when I first read that passage, I should add that she was, despite her hatred of Luna, a lady of great love, devotion, and faith. One of the things that fascinated Chesterton about her was that she had her own tastes that weren't dictated by fashion or other popular notions. God had given her a completely different set of toys from her soulmate, and Chesterton enjoyed playing with them, even if he felt no desire to own them.
In that same vein, C.S. Lewis, writing in The Screwtape Letters as a devil giving advice on temptation, said, "The man who truly and disinterestedly enjoys any one thing in the world, for its own sake, and without caring twopence what other people say about it, is by that very fact forearmed against some of our subtlest modes of attack. You should always try to make the patient abandon the people or food he really likes in favor of the 'best' people, the 'right' food, the 'important' books. I have known a human defended from strong temptations to social ambition by a still stronger taste for tripe and onions."
These are the toys that God gives us: the passions that drive us to make everyday choices. And the threat to enjoying these toys comes from addictions.
Addictions, whether they be to material things or to behaviors such as sex, all begin as ordinary passions and descend into compulsive obsessions. Allowing oneself to fall victim to them is like taking the wonderful magic box of exquisite tin soldiers which God has given us, and painting them all the same shade of dull brown. This is what happens when we allow ourselves to focus on a single passion—or no passion at all.
When you come home from work today, think about what a pleasure it is to have that overpriced skim latte, the Weekend section of the New York Times, the precious minutes of daydreaming time during your walk from the train station, the voice of Van Morrison wafting out of your neighborhood pub. God's given you a unique set of toys that enables you to appreciate any and all of these and an infinite variety of other pleasures as only you can. And if none of those things please, there's always the sun in the morning and the moon at night. * * *
I have a new prayer that I use every time I feel lonely or dissatisfied with my life.
I say, "Dear God, thank you for having something better for me."
Think about it. If you're not satisfied with some aspect of your life, there are two options. Either this is the best that God is going to give you for the rest of your life, or He has something better, however close or far away it may be.
Past experience has shown me that in a great many areas of my life, when I thought that things would never improve, they eventually did, even if it took many years. Rationally speaking, it makes far more sense to me to thank God for what He's eventually going to do, than to constantly berate Him and plead with Him over what He hasn't done.
Actually, I do still berate and plead. But this prayer gives God—and me—a break. * * *"The Truth in Small Things" is a frequent feature on The Dawn Patrol. If you would like to be notified by e-mail when each new installment appears, write DawnEdenSmallThings@hotmail.com .
4:36 AM
|
Thursday, April 29, 2004
That's My Bill!
Don't let the headline fool you. This front-page story's from May 23, 1996. I found it while housecleaning tonight [stop the presses!] and did a double-take.
Note that Clinton was "eager to squelch" the issue because it was an election year and he didn't want Dole to take him to task on homosexual marriage. It was obvious in May 1996 that the American public wanted the institution of one-man/one-woman marriage to be preserved. It's obvious today, too, according to polls—but my, how brazen the homosexual-marriage lobby has become in eight short years. For that, I blame popular culture's efforts to normalize homosexuality, as well as the failure of those who uphold traditional marriage to aggressively defend the institution from all the things that threaten it—from divorce and adultery on down.
4:30 AM
|
Gal Who Hates to Cook Seeks Fungi
Here's another thing I found while housecleaning: a handwritten recipe from Mom for her famous Baked Stuffed Mushrooms! I must have been planning a party or [gasp] considered cooking for a date.
But just because I don't cook doesn't mean the world should be deprived of Mom's classic recipe. Just looking at it makes me hungry. I could live on these things.
So, here you go. Despite the lowfat ingredients, I can assure you that this hors d'oeuvre is as cool and retro as it gets—a real early-Sixties cocktail-party item. If you use the recipe, please write to me and I will forward all compliments to the chef:
BAKED STUFFED MUSHROOMS A LA MOM
12 large mushrooms
4 T. lowfat margarine
1 tsp. grated onion
1/2 cup Italian bread crumbs
1 T. healthy spaghetti sauce
Directions:
1. Wash mushrooms [You gotta love my mom. She knew I was not a cook.]
2. Take stems out of caps.
3. Chop stems
4. Add grated onion.
5. Melt margarine in pan.
6. Brown stems and onion in frying pan.
7. Add other ingredients to pan.
8. Stuff mushroom caps with mixture.
9. Place in microwave-safe dish: glass or heavy plastic. [I love it! Only a mom could have added that qualification of microwave-safe materials. And she was so thoughtful to give me a microwave recipe, so I wouldn't have to use my scary, "Honeymooners"-era gas oven.]
10. Cover with plastic wrap.
11. Vent wrap by piercing once with fork.
12. Microwave on high for 5-6 minutes.
In My Weekend State
For my friends who read The Dawn Patrol without clicking through Gaits of Eden, here's what you missed—a happy picture that a friend snapped of me last night (during my "weekend") at a Mediabistro party.
4:06 AM
|
Wednesday, April 28, 2004
Groucho Marx Syndrome
Today brought two reminders that I don't always want to be in a club that would have me for a member:
- The Page Six cartoon equating John Kerry's campaign with Al Qaeda's plan to kill 80,000 people. (If you're viewing that link after today, look for the April 28 cartoon.) Someone, please, tell the world that not all conservatives think like third-graders.
- The listing in the New York Resident's "This Week in New York" e-newsletter for "Blessing of the Bikes":
Fee: $69, includes bike, helmet, licensed guide, and free blessing
Saturday, May 1
Ride through Central Park and Harlem and get our [sic] bike blessed by the Very Rev. Dr. James A. Kowalski at the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine, 8:30 am – 1:30 pm The time-honored traditions of ship-christening and "Bless This House" placards aside, it's hard to be taken seriously as a Christian when Very Rev.'s are willing to bestow God's blessing on inanimate objects. My only relief is the specification that, while the fee for the event is $69, the blessing is "free." "Very" interesting—and very sad.
3:30 PM
|
A 'Fierce' of the Heart
"The prophet is a man who feels fiercely," writes Abraham Joshua Heschel in his classic The Prophets. I thought about that just now as I found these words in Jeremiah 17 (NKJV): Heal me, O LORD, and I shall be healed;
Save me, and I shall be saved,
For You are my praise.
Indeed they say to me,
"Where is the word of the LORD?
Let it come now!"
As for me, I have not hurried away from being a shepherd who follows You,
Nor have I desired the woeful day;
You know what came out of my lips;
It was right there before You.
Do not be a terror to me;
You are my hope in the day of doom. What strikes me about those words is that they're so passionate. We often think of prophets as having been mere mouthpieces of God—not talking back to Him. And if we think of the kinds of requests they made of the Lord, we imagine the prayers as being general petitions for Israel—pretty by-the-book, if you'll pardon the expression. This has a different tone altogether.
This has a tone so intimate, it's what we normally associate with a lover. But no one could trust a human being so deeply as Jeremiah trusts God. His words are intense, they're unrelenting, they're fearful, yet they show he's utterly confident of being accepted. Moreover, one gets the impression that, even if the prophet wasn't certain how God would respond, he was absolutely certain that any response would be the right response.
Ray Pritchard writes in He's God and We're Not that acknowledging and submitting to God's sovereignty always leads to joyful praise. When you pray, do you feel that you're getting precious one-on-One time with the loving Father who holds your entire life—as well as the rest of the world—in His hands? Or do you feel that you're saying a few words to a vague presence who is getting a billion other requests at the same time? If you're not feeling a deep sense of excitement and wonder at being able to communicate directly and intimately with the King of the universe, then you need to stop and think about this great opportunity that prayer affords, which you can have at any time.
A great paradox of God is that if we make ourselves smaller, He will fill us and make us bigger. "He must increase, but I must decrease." Through Him, we can have more spiritual riches than we could ever possibly have on our own.
I need God in my life. I need His wisdom. I need His healing love. I am grateful for the countless prayers of mine that He has answered. More than that, however much I may nag Him about the remaining items on my prayer list, I am grateful beyond measure that He answers prayers in His own time.
5:03 AM
|
Tuesday, April 27, 2004
The Truth in Small Things, Part 13: The Last Temptation of Lamont Cranston
My mother had a dream a while back where she was visited by an angelic figure. The lovely and gentle feminine presence, bathed in white, resembled Mom's late mother, but she wasn't a ghost.
As best I can recall of Mom's description, the figure said, "You don't understand, my dear. In Heaven, we do not have feelings."
Mom was hurt at the thought of this. "You have love, don't you?"
"Oh, no, my dear," the angelic figure responded. "Love is not a feeling. Love is a presence."
Whether or not that was a real visitation, I'd say that's a godly message. I find it reassuring to think that souls in heaven are not tossed about by passions the way we are.
But more important than what I think is that the message is backed up by James 1:17: " Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning."
No variableness, neither shadow of turning. Notice how that comes right after "every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights."
Think about how we get the sun's light. From our perspective, the sun's light bends according to the hours and the seasons. Within the course of a single day, the shadow on a sundial will turn full circle. Doing a 360—that's what we humans call passionate. The sun's changes may be predictable, but they're radical all the same.
Yet the sun never moves. It's only because we move that its shadows appear to be so capricious.
It's the same with God. He's the same yesterday, and today, and forever. But how we position ourselves in relation to Him can change our whole life.
Are you in a position today where, like a plant on a windowsill at high noon, you're able to receive God's direct sunlight? Or are you approaching God at an angle, letting His light hit you in some places while guarding the rest of yourself jealously in shadow?
Don't be shy. I have my shadows—lots of them. Every time I begrudge someone for making me move my bag from the subway seat next to me so they can sit down, that's a shadow. Every time I congratulate myself on my self-control while being jealous of those who enjoy pleasures that I've forsaken, that's a shadow. (Two, actually.) Every time I say or e-mail something dismissive to someone for no other reason than that they bug me, that's a shadow. And every time I resent someone for not being something that they couldn't possibly be if they tried, that's a shadow.
It's hard to release our shadows, partly because we're comfortable the way we are—maybe not happy, but comfortable. More than that, we may not trust that God could enlighten our darkness if we asked Him—and the thought of being disappointed by Him deters us from taking the chance. John 3:19-21: "And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."
Someone like me who believes in God yet holds onto some shadows is acting on the assumption that God has the power to change some areas of our lives, but not others. Now, it's true that we can't rely upon the Lord to answer every specific need in our lives when we need them. But there are certain blessings of His that are always available from God through the Holy Spirit and which He dispenses more readily than we can imagine. Two of them are:
- Wisdom. Proverbs 2:6: "For the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding." James 1:5: " If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him."
- Strength. Psalm 18:1: "I will love thee, O LORD, my strength." Ephesians 3:17: "That He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory, to be strengthened with might by his Spirit in the inner man."
Yet, even these blessings, which I request in prayer every day, aren't really necessary if you can master God's little shortcut. It's that thing that the angel in Mom's dream mysteriously described as a "presence."
The idea of love as a presence and not a passion is tantalizingly similar to Paul's definition of faith: "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen" (Hebrews 11:1). It gives love a tangibility and a certainty that we normally do not feel in everyday life, save for the moments when we contemplate those dearest to us.
More than that, love as a presence suggests something that's without form and inescapeable—somethingthat could conceivably fill everything. It's the message of 1 John: "love is of God" and "God is love."
Love is God's little shortcut because, as Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 13, no other gift is complete without it, and by itself it surpasses all gifts.
If love really is a presence in Heaven, then it's possible to have that presence, unstained by emotional peaks and valleys, here on Earth. For, as Jesus said, "the kingdom of God is within you."
Today when I feel a shadow—which will very probably be the moment I turn off my computer and retire for the night with only a teddy bear for company—I will think about that Presence. And I will ask Him in whom there is no shadow of turning to lift me up from the world's perspective, so I may see clearly how to stay in His direct light.
3:36 AM
Monday, April 26, 2004
Stall in a Day's Work
"Who could have possibly written that puerile headline in today's paper about the 'exploding-toilet' lawsuit? Not moi...!"
3:28 AM
|
Sunday, April 25, 2004
Disgusteen
Former fetus, 1970
Today you will hear on the news about a march in Washington that is officially dedicated to "Choice, Justice, Access, Health, Abortion, Global and Family Planning." One of the march's sponsors is Planned Parenthood.
Planned Parenthood does more than offer abortions. It offers sex advice for underage teenagers. Not just pregnancy advice or birth-control advice, but advice on every aspect of sex, given from a celebratory "everybody's doing it" standpoint, as may be seen in the organization's official teen Web site, Teenwire. (Please note: The preceding link and all of the following Teenwire links contain graphic sexual references.)
If you or anyone you know support Planned Parenthood, you should know that their Web site encourages underage teenagers to:
- Keep trying to have sex even if they are having problems with intercourse due to nerves
- Overcome performance anxiety. The preceding link will take you to the "experts'" solution for a teen who writes, "im 17 years old, and me and my girlfriend really want to have sex on a regular basis. but i tend to get shy about this and find ways to get out of it. i want to have sex but i just get scared i wont perform."
- Find "lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender" sex partners online.
Let me repeat that.
If you or someone you know is sending money to Planned Parenthood, that money is going to some adult sitting at a computer, who writes detailed instructions for underage teenagers on how to pick up lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender sex partners online.
I would be offended if they were inviting 14-year-olds to meet heterosexual sex partners online. But the thought of this organization, which claims to be protecting teenagers, instead inviting them to meet sexual predators who may steer them into homosexuality at a time when they are most impressionable, is truly disgusting.
This is especially offensive in light of Planned Parenthood's notorious refusal to aid authorities in arresting the perpetrators of statutory rape. A 2002 study showed that the overwhelming majority of underage pregnant teens and children are impregnated by adults. WorldNetDaily reports that "when a teen-age girl reports to a Planned Parenthood worker that she is pregnant by an adult man, more often than not the organization conspires to conceal the crime involved. Sometimes, the employees actually coach the girls to avoid parental involvement and reporting requirements to law enforcement."
(The WorldNetDaily article also mentions Planned Parenthood's roots in the eugenics movement, which supported and was supported by the Nazi Party. Planned Parenthood's original goal was to decrease the births of "undesirables" and thereby create, as Margaret Sanger boasted, "a race of thoroughbreds." This has been well documented, including in this article about the Rockefellers' longstanding support of Planned Parenthood.)
The Planned Parenthood Teenwire Web site in fact seems positively obsessed with helping underage homosexual teens "hook up" online. A section that is made up to look like a teenage girl's Weblog features an entry in which the blogger's best friend takes pity on a lonely homosexual high-school pal and shows him how to find a boy in a chat room.
If you, like me, do not support Planned Parenthood, here are some words to remember as you watch what is sure to be unavoidable march footage on TV today. From the 139th Psalm: For You formed my inward parts;
You covered me in my mother's womb.
I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made;
Marvelous are Your works,
And that my soul knows very well.
My frame was not hidden from You,
When I was made in secret,
And skillfully wrought in the lowest parts of the earth.
Your eyes saw my substance, being yet unformed.
And in Your book they all were written,
The days fashioned for me,
When as yet there were none of them.
2:25 AM
|
Saturday, April 24, 2004
The Truth in Small Things, Part 12: If I Fell
Last night, I dreamed I was accosted by a manlike creature who was alternately beautiful and demonic—but mostly demonic. Not the Devil, but a devil, as C.S. Lewis would say. And like any good devil (so to speak), he tried to tempt me by getting me to jump from a high place—as Satan tempted Jesus.
I don't recall being up in a high place—only looking down and seeing nothing but a blur, as though I were so high up that none of the features below could be distinguished. It wasn't so much like looking down at Earth as it was looking down into another dimension that was several levels lower than any earthly surface could be.
Unlike Jesus' temptation, the tempter didn't tell me that angels would prevent my hitting the ground. Instead, he played upon my old fantasy of flying, which was my favorite thing to dream about when I was a kid.
I can tell you exactly what the tempter said to me, because I typed it out as soon as I woke up. It embarrasses me to share it, because it so obviously reflects my love of the language of Victorian-era writers like J.M. Barrie and Lewis Carroll. But then, deep down, we all think the Devil speaks like George Sanders in The Picture of Dorian Gray, don't we?
My devil said, "You can fall for ever so long—as long as you'd like—and never hit the ground."
In a dream, that's a tremendously appealing proposition. I was seriously tempted, stopping short only because the tempter was so obviously evil.
What I find fascinating about the offer is that, as with all great lies, there's a strong shade of truth in it. It is possible to fall into sin in this life and never hit the ground. Because as long as you're alive, there's always farther to fall.
When addicts, alcoholics, or depressives speak retrospectively of when they "hit bottom," they remember it as a good thing. It felt unbearable at the time, but it was the only way they could realize they needed help.
Look at the most pitiful derelicts on the street—the decrepit, career homeless who turn down help from social-service agencies and instead panhandle day after day for money to buy alcohol and drugs. They look like they've hit bottom, but they haven't. They won't hit bottom unless their entire means of surviving becomes impossible—and maybe not even then. The human spirit, even when warped by alcohol, drugs, and mental illness, retains its ability to say "no"—and "no" for many people is far easier than "yes."
But don't think you or I are so different from those people. We too want to fall without hitting the ground, and we can—through addiction to cigarettes, food, alcohol, sex, or anything that prevents us from hitting the solid rock that's terrifyingly close to the soles of our feet. We may even know that there's a "cornerstone" down there, and we fear falling on it because we know it will break us. Matthew 21:42,44: "Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?...And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder."
We don't want to hit the ground not because it means physical death, but because it would require a death to self. We would have to face the fact that we cannot live for only ourselves—that our choices affect our eternal life, as well as our ability to achieve God's purpose for us in this life.
I use the word "we" because I did fall on that cornerstone, and was healed from depression. Yet I still need to call God's blessings and promises to remembrance every day, to recall that, even though I live in this world, the wellspring of my life is hidden with Him.
My earliest fantasy of falling is tied in with Alice's fall down the rabbit hole in Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. It's a long fall, and even though the rabbit hole's dark, Alice has no fear. She simply lets her mind wander ("Do cats eat bats? Do bats eat cats?") and trust that when she returns home, everyone will think her brave for enduring the experience. Suddenly, she thumps down into a pile of sticks and leaves and gets up without a scratch.
Putting aside the fact that there's no book if Alice goes splat, why is she able to fall so gently? I believe there's a real reason here, and it goes to the heart of Carroll's strong Christian faith. She could withstand the fall because she was unencumbered by guile. As G.K. Chesterton noted, "Satan fell by the force of gravity"—or, conversely, "Angels can fly because they can take themselves lightly."
That doesn't mean you or I should tempt fate by poking around rabbit holes. But I do believe it's possible to have a lightness of spirit without fearing the ground. * * *
"The Truth in Small Things" is a frequent feature on The Dawn Patrol. If you would like to be notified of subsequent installments via e-mail, write DawnEdenSmallThings -at- hotmail.com .
12:53 AM
|
Thursday, April 22, 2004
Love at First Bite
At the age of eight, I was in the "boys are not all yucky and I kind of like some of them" stage. It's a very nice stage to be in, and I recommend it. Much easier to take than the ensuing "obsessed with boys" stage, and far more pleasant than the preceding "boys are yucky" stage.
Unfortunately, eight is a very difficult age at which to care about boys, because it's also an age when one loses teeth. I was at summer camp that year and my smile had a big gap that made any attempts at glamour look ridiculous.
Still, I couldn't stay away from the object of my attraction, an older boy named Jason Brimer. I always liked witty types, and he was unquestionably the camp clown, pulling all sorts of silly stunts and bringing the house down at the talent show with his impressions.
Jason must have known that I liked him, because I followed him around a lot. But beyond that, I knew I couldn't hope for much. He was far too popular to make time for a goofy little squirt like me.
This being the mid-1970s, before the age of lawsuits, I suppose it was inevitable that my bunk should be raided early one morning by a boys' bunk. I awoke on my upper-bunk bed to find the room swarming with boys making noise, throwing things around, and generally causing mayhem. Apparently the camp powers-that-be thought it was adorable childish fun, but the only pleasure I got out of it was the thought of having something else to add to the "Camp Grenada" horror stories that filled my letters to Mom.
(They really were horror stories, too. I remember one letter that simply consisted of "I HATE CAMP"—written in huge letters that took up the entire page. When I later asked Mom what she thought of it, she said she'd shown it to a friend as "a classic." I didn't know what a classic was at that age, but I determined that it must be something horrible.)
So, throughout the raid, I stayed in bed with the covers pulled up to my chin, pretending to be oblivious while waiting anxiously for the shouting, shampoo-squirting, and panty-throwing to end.
But I couldn't fool Jason Brimer.
He came up to the edge of my bed, which was just at the level of the top of his head. I quaked a little as he looked up at me. Would he smear toothpaste on my nice bedspread? Or would he destroy me with his wit? I got called names all the time, but an insult from him would really hurt.
He smiled. I started to smile back.
"Hi, toothless," he said. Then he ran away.
Afterwards, one of my bunkmates who had noticed Jason come up to me asked what had transpired. When I told her, she said, "Wow, he must not like you."
"No," I said bravely. "He does like me. He said it because he can't say he likes me."
It is not for nothing that I am a psychologist's daughter.
My hope was borne out mere days later, when Jason professed his fondness for me—though a counselor had a word with him to prevent its going further. But that's not what matters.
What matters is that, for the rest of my life, whenever I find myself slipping back into "boys are yucky" mode, I will remember the sheer joy of that "Hi, toothless." In a moment, in a room full of party people, one man can say two words that create a startling feeling of intimacy. It's happened to me since then. I know it'll happen again.
1:54 AM
|
Wednesday, April 21, 2004
The Merry-Go-Round Broke Down
A few nights ago, I had a dream that a very attractive man was giving me a kiss. Now, these days, I almost never dream anything remotely in the realm of fantasy-fulfillment. My dreams tend to be bland rehashes of the day's events, twisted through a surreal strainer. I ride a lot of trains that go nowhere. If I'm lucky, I remember that I'm dreaming, break into a bakery, and go hog wild. But a kiss from someone who doesn't instantly morph horribly into a family member? No way.
Even stranger was what was going through my mind as I was being kissed. It was exactly what I would have thought had it been real life, but it's been so long since I'd been in such a situation that I'd forgotten my usual reaction.
I thought, "This is the beginning of the end."
The end of fun. It doesn't get any better. From the moment one becomes conscious the delightful shock of the first kiss, it turns into a race for sexual fulfillment—one with a predictable and rather dreary outcome.
Think of how you feel when you're watching a romantic old movie, like "It's a Wonderful Life." The tension builds as the leads' chemistry becomes apparent. Finally, during that Sam Wainwright phone call, it explodes. George grabs Mary's shoulders, shakes her, tells her he doesn't want to get married—and immediately breaks down and kisses her on the lips. It's incredibly exciting—until you realize that the courtship ends there. From then on, it's wedding bells, bank runs, and getting tossed out by an alternate-universe Mr. Martini.
It's been kind of like that in my life—but without the wedding bells and so on. Instead, the first kiss merely marks the end of the excitement and the beginning of a seemingly inexorable process that starts with hope and ends with "respect."
Although I've done my best to escape that morbid merry-go-round in recent years, I have to hold on to the memory in order to remember why I deserve better than a brass ring. To that end, I can understand why so many women get stuck in casual-dating mode. If one is convinced that nothing better awaits one in life than seduction, then one risks pain and discomfort in order to continue the cycle of pleasure.
Yet that "beginning of the end" feeling persists. I imagine it's one of the things that motivates some men to view pornography—the need for constant novelty to distract from the depressingly finite nature of the thrill. And, like pornography, casual dating requires a degree of emotional detachment and objectification of the desired person. Those are qualities one doesn't normally associate with women, which is why the casual-dating cycle is so sick. It takes women away from their natural desire to seek depth and substance, and turns them into superficial hedonists.
The only thing that can take one out of that debilitating cycle is hope of something better. For me, that hope requires faith—"the substance of things not seen." But such faith, by necessity, has to incorporate the hard truth that it's possible I may not get what I earnestly desire—even though in my heart I believe I will.
The real miracle of faith is not that it provides the material things we need, but that it provides the spiritual things that will keep us going until the material things arrive. For me, it provides a perspective that makes me realize, even in my dreams, that what I've experienced of romantic love up to now is only a shadow of what it really is. But more than that, it shows me that loneliness is not a bad thing—not when it's chosen over a life where every conquest holds within it the dull ache of certain defeat.
3:49 AM
|
Monday, April 19, 2004
The Truth in Small Things, Part 11: The Vision Thing
My dad is knowledgeable about many, many things.
Poetry is not one of them.
Yet I can't help but smile this morning as I remember something he said to me when I was 12 and vision problems forced me to get my first prescription eyewear since childhood. It was a time when I was becoming keenly conscious of how boys perceived me, and I wasn't pleased at the thought of looking like a dork.
"Well, you know what they say," he said, trying to be comforting. "Men make passes at girls who wear glasses."
It would be another year or two before I discovered that wasn't exactly what Dorothy Parker wrote. But Dad's version has more love.
2:40 AM
|
Sunday, April 18, 2004
The Truth in Small Things, Part 10: Bridge of Size
Today I am thinking about size.
When I am feeling hurt, lonely, or incapable of achieving what I want to achieve, I try to make myself bigger and more prolific.
It's not enough that there's a "good worker" me. There has to be a "pretty" me. If I'm not kind enough, there has to be a "kind" me. If I'm a wimp, there has to be a "bossy" me. And so on.
Mind you, I don't suffer from multiple-personality disorder. There's a "me" me at the core. But I feel a need to project a persona that fits each situation, so that I can master whatever's required.
Those personas are genuine aspects of me—not phony or put on—but amplified. Bigger. Because I'm terribly conscious that the "real me" isn't big enough to handle all the real-world conflicts and challenges that I face every day.
Here's what I find interesting. When I need to reconcile myself to the world, I make myself bigger. But when God came to dwell with us, He made himself smaller.
I don't just mean that Jesus' form was physically limited. I mean that He became personal. Instead of acting larger than life all the time, addressing people only in general statements meant for all, He walked around to individuals' houses and ate their food. He led the blind, gave them and others His healing touch, and met people where they lived.
You could say that Jesus, as a worker of miracles, couldn't have been that small and personal. But even His miracles were related directly to His ministry. He didn't stop the sun in the sky or cause military battles to be won, and he resisted the Devil's temptation to show off with a swan dive from the Temple. Instead, He helped those who were in His presence, through healing them, feeding them, or keeping them safe from the storm.
More than that, Jesus' miracles were personal in that they were exclusively devoted to helping others. He never made stones into bread for himself—He waited on the Lord for 40 days until the angels ministered to him. And He refused to use His power to overcome any worldly authority—even when His life was at stake.
Jesus could make himself small because He wasn't reconciling himself to the world. He was reconciling the world to himself.
By contrast, I have none of that power. Yet I can follow Jesus' example, becoming smaller without losing my ability to survive in the world, by reconciling myself to Him and trusting that He will elevate me when my smallness is too hard to bear.
Do you see how this works? It seems hard, but He's already done the heavy lifting. * * *
"The Truth in Small Things" is a frequent feature on The Dawn Patrol. If you would like to be notified by e-mail when a new installment appears, write DawnEdenSmallThings -at- hotmail.com .
12:39 AM
|
Saturday, April 17, 2004
I would like to call your attention to an utterly charming and slightly enigmatic entry I just discovered by a blogger called The Happy Homemaker. The entry is called "Stuff" and it is the third item down if you follow that link.
12:57 PM
|
Light blogging today, as I had to finish a piece of pop-music criticism for my friend Rich Appel's e-zine, Hz So Good. If you'd like to receive a free subscription to the 'zine, which covers pop radio from the '50s through the present, write Rich at audiot.savant@verizon.net .
The latest installment of "The Truth in Small Things" appears below. The series was inspired largely by the essays of G.K. Chesterton, especially one called "A Piece of Chalk."
1:18 AM
|
Friday, April 16, 2004
The Truth in Small Things, Part 9: One Fine Day
You may have seen the movie "Groundhog Day," in which Bill Murray put in a wonderful performance as a weatherman who finds himself stuck reliving the same day over and over. But did you know that the stages that the weatherman go through are based on the stages of dying that were delineated by Elizabeth Kübler-Ross? The screenwriter, Danny Rubin, had Bill Murray's character develop by going through Kübler-Ross's five stages of death: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.
The interesting thing about those stages is that, as Rubin suggested in his story, they can also lead to life.
On many levels, one could say that every day, we wake up to the same world. We're the same person in the morning, for one thing—we can't completely make ourselves over overnight. We wake up to the same family; the same friends overall; and, most times, the same home and job. Even if we can change our personality to some degree, we can't change our past. The most extreme plastic surgery couldn't really change what we see in ourselves when we look in the mirror.
Denial, anger, bargaining, depression—I've gone through all those stages in the past. Before I found my current career, I spent years denying that I had chosen a career that couldn't support me. I've suffered from anger—at God and at myself—over not being where I wanted to be in life. Before I had faith, I tried to bargain with God, saying that I'd believe in Him if He did some particular thing to satisfy my wants. And I've suffered from depression—a lonely, isolated depression where I felt as though the rest of the world were progressing and I was stuck every day in the same depressing body, the same depressing personality, the same depressing rut.
Those first four stages progress naturally; one doesn't need any kind of push to get from denial to anger and so on. But that last stage—acceptance—for me required a kickstart. That kickstart was a faith experience—something that made the radio in my head stop waking me up every morning to the same old song.
Except that, in my case, when I woke up to find it was February 3, there was no Andie MacDowell by my side.
Well, actually, I'm relieved she wasn't there—she's not my type. But there was no instant Mr. Right in my life once I was healed from depression. I was on my own.
The word "acceptance" as we use it implies placid submission. But its root comes from the Latin for "to receive." For the act of acceptance to be ongoing, we have to take an active and continual role in it.
What this means is that instead of an ongoing Groundhog Day where our actions have no continual effect, we have the opportunity every day to receive something that is in some way different from what we were offered the day before. Even if it seems the same, it's different because the world has progressed another 360 degrees, and we with it.
This is what the prophet Jeremiah means when he writes that God's mercies are "new every morning."
In my own life, I am beginning to see that acceptance means freedom—not just freedom from depression, but freedom from the myriad of personal barriers that have prevented me from appreciating life's blessings.
I have spent many years of my life lamenting being single. The wisdom of recent years has shown me that, until recently, I was not mature enough to be a godly wife. Likewise, I now see that I haven't let my intended pass me by—I'm certain that I haven't met him yet. Even so, in the past, knowing those things couldn't prevent me from feeling sorry for myself.
But today I had a strange feeling. I realized that, like Bill Murray in the film, I can get up every day confident that the odds are against my meeting my intended. It's not cynicism, but an awareness of being in a situation that I can't control. And I realized that, as in the film, such knowledge is power.
Think about it. If you realized every day that the odds were against your getting something you wanted, you'd have two options. You could give up, resigning yourself to your fate. Or you could conduct your life the way you wanted, enjoying the great relief of no longer having to put so much hope and effort into attaining your goal.
Make no mistake—I still have hope. And I have no desire to use my liberty to become libertine. I just feel this wonderful freedom—freedom from having to go around as this pathetic overage single person who has to look at every conversation with an interesting single man as a possible prelude to a first date. I can speak to men not with bitterness or cynicism, but with utter confidence—treating them with the respect with which I would treat any human being, yet not worrying about the kind of impression I'm making.
Can I really do all this without secretly getting my hopes up that Mr. Right will come along? Of course not! But even if I can get myself to accept a tiny bit of the freedom God gives me in His morning mercies, it will make a significant and very positive change in my life.
The interesting thing about this realization is that it appears mighty similar to the "self-actualization" gospel preached by Oprah and other self-help gurus. I myself tried to practice that in the past. The difference is that the self-actualization proponents try to fill people up by telling them that they are already full. God, by contrast, invites me to make a space in my heart and soul so that He can fill me.
That's something that nobody else can do—turn emptiness into a setting for blessing. He's like a director who can create an entire world starting from a bare and empty stage. I want to see what His imagination can create on mine. * * *
"The Truth in Small Things" is a frequent feature on The Dawn Patrol. If you would like to receive notification by e-mail when each new installment appears, write Dawn EdenSmallThings -at- hotmail.com .
4:57 AM
|
Blame Aretha
Last night, at a cocktail party, I came up with an Evelyn Wood version of my recent entry on how some women accept less than they deserve in order to rationalize having casual sex:
"Respect is the new love."
3:50 AM
|
Twist of Lime
Watching "The Third Man" last night at the Film Forum, I had a bizarre thought during the climactic final scene, which prevented me from appreciating the film the way the director intended. If you don't mind learning how the film ends (and I assure you, it's worth watching even if you know), read on...
The final scene of that classic 1949 film takes place in the sewers of Vienna. Harry Lime, played by Orson Welles (be still my beating heart), is chased by police through a maze of underground passages, with the sewer gushing throughout. He knows those passages fairly well but not perfectly—he winds up at a dead end.
It occurred to me as I was watching this scene, one of the most admired in cinema, that if this were an American film instead of a British one, and if it were made just a few years later, Harry Lime would have gotten away. He would have gotten away because he would have known the sewers better. And he would have known the sewers better, because he would have been played by Art Carney, in the guise of "The Honeymooners"' Ed Norton.
Can't you imagine? Instead of the famous "Harry Lime Theme" playing on a zither, Lime would dart through the sewer passages to the tune of a scratchy 78 of "The Hucklebuck." Instead of dealing in black-market penicillin, he would have sold Vienna thousands of useless Handy Housewife Helpers.
Oh no.
Now I'm starting to imagine if Orson Welles, barred from playing Harry Lime, had taken over the role of Ralph Kramden—in full "Citizen Kane" mode...
ALICE: But Ralph, people will think—
RALPH: What I tell them to think!
[Audience laughter]
3:33 AM
|
Pride Goeth Before...
A fall. That's right. Not my real hair.
I've been feeling dorky lately because I've had to wear my glasses instead of contact lenses for the past week, as I have conjunctivitis. My eye-drop regimen requires me to wear my specs for three days more, so tonight, on an impulse, I decided to buy something fun to make me feel more glamorous: a fall. Probably the only place I'll wind up wearing it is work tomorrow, but even there it'll be nice to jazz up the ol' routine.
There really is something wonderfully retro about this big ol' tail of Dynel or whatever it is, especially combined with the glasses (which are an authentic Twiggy® pair). I feel like Tina Louise playing a librarian in a spy spoof, where Flint or Matt Helm says, "You know, you would be beautiful if you would just take off your glasses..."
2:37 AM
|
Thursday, April 15, 2004
Lady and the Swamp
I don't drive, and as a result, although I can get to most of the places I want to go via public transportation, there are still a few things I can't do. There's one fantasy in particular I've held for years, which I've been unable to fulfill due to lack of wheels.
I would really like to visit a swamp. A good, old-fashioned, marshy swamp.
There's something tantalizing and mysterious about them whenever I see them through the window of a NJ Transit commuter train. There's one in Secaucus, a wide expanse of ponds and marsh grass, where, during the spring and summer, a lone white egret holds sway. Another one, in Mount Tabor (a semi-rural area of Morris County), creeps rebelliously all the way up to a paint shop, its water flooding the back of the shop's parking lot.
But my favorite swamp by far is the one that I spy when the train passes through Morris Plains. It's a small area directly behind a condo development, made up of shallow brown ponds; dead long grass that looks like straw; and one majestic, overturned dead tree that forms a kind of lacey proscenium.
Unlike the wetlands with the egret, the Morris Plains swamp doesn't look like a thriving ecosystem. It looks dead and muddy. Which is why I find it fascinating.
Don't imagine that I have any love of dead things. What I like is the sense of balance. Here's this condo development with its ticky-tacky little boxes on the hillside, and below it this gothic monstrosity created by nature. And that work of nature, even dead, looks more mysterious and poetic than the gray clapboard domiciles that turn their backs to it.
It's not only in contrast with civilization that swamps hold fascination. The thought of a gloriously ugly, marshy swamp appeals to me even when contrasted with a beautiful, healthy field or forest. To be sure, in general, I'd rather look at the field or forest. But the vision of the swamp outside the train window is a rare treat, because it defies conventional rules. The wetlands are the aquatic version of Moses' vision of the burning bush: They're always watery, but they never flow anywhere.
But my favorite thing about swamps is that, for all intents and purposes, they're useless.
Oh, I know they may have rare species living in their murky depths, and they feed the frogs with their mosquitos. And I'm glad the Secaucus egret has a marsh to call home. But practically speaking, compared to other nature spots, swamps are difficult to enjoy. You can't walk through them without getting up to your knees in mud, you can't fish comfortably in them, you certainly can't swim in them, and you can't plant things in them. You can only trudge heavily around them, or just gaze at them through the window of a passing train.
You could say that swamps hold such interest for me because I used to live in one—figuratively speaking, of course. I was awash in depression for my entire adult life until four and a half years ago, when I accepted Jesus and received a dramatic healing.
I now see that my depression was, like the swamp, useless. Yet, when I look at people who suffer from depression or have overcome it, and I look at shiny happy people in their ticky-tacky little boxes who seem unable to relate to deep emotional pain, you know what? I identify more with those in the swamp, and my heart goes out to them.
It's not that I want to go back into that particular swamp. That swamp is death. It's the experience of being surrounded by bitter water, and never asking for the living water.
But I do find that. just as the ugly marsh adds a sense of balance to the more beautiful side of nature, an understanding of depression helps me to better appreciate life. And I don't just mean that in the manner of the man who, when asked why he banged his head against the way, said, "Because it feels so good when I stop."
To be depressed—really sad, not just angry, bored, or jaded—is to acknowledge a sense of lack in one's life. It makes one feel empty, vulnerable, and far from salvation. Yet, it's just that emptiness and vulnerability, the proverbial God-shaped vacuum, that the Lord seeks to fill, as David writes in Psalm 34: "The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit."
There are many routes to salvation, and I certainly don't recommend the swamps of depression as the way to go. But if you can survive them, they can give you a valuable sense of brokenness and humility—one that's hard to gain if your eyes are turned only on beautiful fields and forests.
Today, I'm seeing more verdant horizons in my life than ever before. I thank God every day that I no longer live in a swamp. Yet, I still look out the train window to see the dead grass and muddy marshes. And I'm thankful that, even though I no longer live in those swamps, God lets me view them from a safe distance.
2:12 AM
|
Wednesday, April 14, 2004
The Truth in Small Things, Part 8: The Lord of the Wings
One of the Bible's most striking metaphors for God is that of a large bird, particularly an eagle, that protects its children with its wings. We see this in Psalm 63, for example: "Because thou hast been my help, therefore in the shadow of thy wings will I rejoice."
There is something inherently comforting about this image.
One of my earliest memories is of looking forward to saying good night to my dad. He would be lying in bed, reading—wearing the big burgundy velour robe that I loved to borrow—and Mom would bring me over to say good night before she would take me back into my room and tuck me in. When I approached, Dad would fold his arm that wasn't holding his reading matter and invite me, "Baby Bird," to come under "Papa Bird"'s wing. I buried my head on his chest and for a moment felt completely safe and secure.
It was a beautiful way to end my day. I didn't even mind that I had to go to bed before "The Sonny and Cher Comedy Hour" was over.
It wasn't until years later, when I was a teen, that I learned of the Bible's depicting God in avian terms, and then it was through a "true-life" anecdote in Reader's Digest. The story was about an old lady who was accosted in an alley by two men who tried to mug her. Terrified, she shouted the first words that came into her head, paraphrased from Psalm 91: "He covers me with His feathers! He covers me with His feathers!"
Well, you know how that story ends. One of the would-be muggers said to the other, "She's crazy. Let her go."
The interesting thing about that passage from Psalm 91—"He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust"—is the verse that immediately precedes it: "Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence." It's not just God who is depicted as a bird; it's us.
Think about that image: a bird delivering another bird from the one who would try to ensnare it—and doing so by covering the other bird.
I see in it an image of Jesus, who delivers us from evil and covers our sins with His sacrifice of His own body.
There's also a strange and beautiful paradox in the passage I mentioned earlier from Psalm 63 that states, "in the shadow of thy wings will I rejoice." Many times in the Hebrew Bible, shadows are associated with death—most famously in the 23rd Psalm: "Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death..." Yet, when a shadow is caused by God's protection, it becomes not death, but life itself. Even its darkness turns to light. In the words of the prophet Micah (chapter 7), " Rejoice not against me, O mine enemy: when I fall, I shall arise; when I sit in darkness, the Lord shall be a light unto me."
If you suffer from loneliness, as I do despite having wonderful friends and family whom I love; if you are suffering persecution at your job or in other areas of your daily life; if you are ill; or if there is any area of your life where you feel a lack, think about those great wings of God. The Lord is already covering you with those wings, perhaps without your even realizing how much so, and He has delivered you with the sacrifice that He himself provided.
We must remember that not all shadows are evil. Sometimes, when it looks as though our world has darkened, it is not because God has forgotten us. It is because He is protecting us. ***
"The Truth in Small Things" is a frequent feature on The Dawn Patrol. If you would like to be notified whenever a new installment appears, send an e-mail to DawnEdenSmallThings -at- hotmail.com .
3:10 AM
|
Mac Swift at Vessel of Honour is currently engaged in a good old-fashioned knock-down, drag-'em-out, theological war of wits with Bertrand Russell fan Wes. Mac has some excellent arguments, and I highly recommend reading both his blog entry and the back-and-forth in the comments section.
2:50 AM
|
Tuesday, April 13, 2004
Today's paper has a headline I wrote about the National Debt Clock's being taken down temporarily: "Debt takes a holiday as 'clock' is removed".
5:33 PM
|
UPDATED—Domani or Your Life
On my way home last night, as I passed by a Johnny Rockets—part of the retro-style burger chain—I heard, wafting from the outside speakers, the old Shirelles tune "Will You Love Me Tomorrow."
That Number One hit from 1960 is an amazing song on many levels, from the way in which it perfect encapsulates a young single woman's fear of being used, to the fact that its words were written not by a single woman, but a married man—Gerry Goffin, whose wife, Carole King, wrote the music.
Like many songs from that more innocent era, "Will You Love Me Tomorrow" expresses feelings that most people would be too embarrassed to verbalize. There's something painful about the way its vulnerable narrator leaves herself wide open. Yet, even though her asking the song's title question implies a certain amount of courage, it's clear that she's ready to accept a positive answer without questioning it—which is not surprising, given the lyrics' description of how the evening has progressed. By the time one is worrying about how the other person will feel tomorrow, it is usually too late.
For most unattached single women in New York City, and I would imagine much of the rest of the country as well, casual sex is the norm. It's encouraged by all the women's magazines and television shows from "Oprah" on down, as well as films, music, and the culture in general. And while "love" is celebrated, women are told that they should not demand to be loved tomorrow—only respected.
This accepted single-woman lifestyle is more like a drug habit than a dating paradigm. In what can sadly be an endless cycle, single women feel lonely because they are not loved, so they have casual sex with men who do not love them. I too followed that cycle, but when I found my faith four years ago at the age of 31, I knew that it had to end.
As with any habit, getting with the program was a painful process, and staying with it has never been easy. But I gradually found that as I was tempted to start the cycle again, a new thought would emerge to give me pause—an antidote to the pleasure principle. I call it the tomorrow principle.
I first discovered the tomorrow principle late one night, as I was preparing to leave a party. The host was an old acquaintance of mine, someone I'd known for years, though never very well. We'd long had a mild flirtation going, but nothing had come of it because we didn't really have much in common other than physical attraction. So I was caught off guard when he asked me if I'd like to stay the night.
I knew I didn't want to return to the old cycle. But what made me say no was not the force of conviction. It was a terrible vision that flashed through my brain, as real as if it had actually happened.
In that vision, I saw myself and the party host the next morning, at a diner. We were having breakfast. In front of me was my usual poached eggs on dry rye toast, no potatoes, and coffee with skim milk.
It was pathetic.
Just the idea of one more uncomfortable morning-after breakfast, my loveless partner oozing with "respect," was more than I could bear.
The scene also had a grotesque quality. Here I was, so choosy that I insisted on four different specifications on my diner breakfast, and I couldn't hold out for the one man with whom I could share every breakfast for the rest of my life?
So I thanked the host for a lovely party, and I went home. I think I cried. But I don't regret it. And I've lived by the tomorrow principle ever since.
If you have to ask someone if they'll still love you tomorrow, they don't love you tonight. * * *
UPDATE: Charles G. Hill has added to his blog some insightful observations on this topic.
12:51 AM
|
Monday, April 12, 2004
In today's edition of the newspaper where I work as a copy editor, I had to write a banner headline in 100-point type for a story on "The Passion of the Christ"'s return to No. 1 at the box office over Easter weekend. Someone had already written "Resurrected" for the headline over the accompanying graphic, and I didn't want to push the "Jesus is Risen" angle. Admittedly, it takes some compromise to make silly puns about a religious subject in any case, but I wanted to avoid mocking the essential tenet of Christian faith.
So what did I write?
AMAZING GROSS
P.S. I also have a headline in the same edition that reads, "B'klyn DMV signs don't point where they auto".
4:04 PM
|
The Truth in Small Things, Part 7: Hope on a Rope
For a decade, James Boswell had dreamed of bringing his friend, the great English writer Dr. Samuel Johnson, on a tour of the Western Islands of Boswell's native Scotland. But one night in September 1773, after the two men had finally embarked upon their tour, that dream threatened to turn into a nightmare as their ship was caught in a terrible thunderstorm.
While Johnson, blissfully unaware of the danger, relaxed below deck, Boswell paced the boards, terrified of anything happening to him or the already-legendary man of letters, who had placed his trust in his Scottish friend. As Boswell saw that the others on deck were busy, he asked one of them, a nobleman known for his mariner skills, if there were anything he could do.
"He, with a happy readiness, put into my hand a rope, which was fixed to the top of one of the masts, and told me to hold it 'til he bade me pull," Boswell wrote in his journal. "If I had considered the matter, I might have seen that this could not have been of the least service; but his object was to keep me out of the way of those who were busy working the vessel, and at the same time to divert my fear, by employing me, and making me think that I was of use. Thus did I stand firm to my post, while the wind and rain beat upon me, always expecting a call to pull my rope."
Reading that passage recently, I was struck by the love in the nobleman's act. Even the deception in it cannot be seen as something wrong or unkind. There really was nothing Boswell, who had no sailing experience, could do but wait out the storm. The nobleman's making him feel useful gave him a better chance of survival than if he had continued to pace the decks, and took his mind off his tremendous fear. And he did survive—the boat and everyone in it made it to a safe harbor.
The story reminds me of the famous "Footprints" piece, which uses the image of footprints in the sand to show that, during the most difficult times, when we cannot see how God is working in our lives, it is then that He is carrying us.
I am a great fan of fairy tales. One of the common gimmicks of fairy tales is a character who has been granted a single supernatural ability, one that appears at first glance to be completely useless. But the reader knows that, one day, that ability—whether it be a knowledge of dog language, or the capacity to swallow the sea—will turn out to be the one thing that character needs to save his life.
I have been given such an ability. No, I can't hold conversations with dogs—not meaningful ones, anyway. However, I do have a supernatural power given me that is so subtle that, to those around me, it appears to be of little use. In fact, too much of the time, I take it for granted. Sometimes I forget that I have it. But one day in the near or distant future, I will look back and realize that this magical ability has enabled me to gain everything I wanted in life.
It's more than an ability, really; it's an obsession. My wonder at it underlies much of my conversation and practically everything I write. If I share with you what it is, you'll see that, even when I appear to be writing about something different, I'm really a one-trick pony. But I'll reveal it to you anyway, because it would be c | |